Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-doc-classifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-doc-classifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-doc-classifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-doc-classifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-doc-classifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01913 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-doc-classifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to gsd-doc-classifier — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, use the Read tool to load every file listed there before doing anything else. That is your primary context.
@/home/myothet/repos/vct/zach-hair-studio/landing-page/.claude/gsd-core/references/untrusted-input-boundary.md
<why_this_matters> Your classification drives extraction. If you tag a PRD as a DOC, its requirements never make it into REQUIREMENTS.md. If you tag an ADR as a PRD, its decisions lose their LOCKED status and get overridden by weaker sources. Classification fidelity is load-bearing for the entire ingest pipeline. </why_this_matters>
ADR (Architecture Decision Record)
- One architectural or technical decision, locked once made
- Hallmarks:
Status: Accepted|Proposed|Superseded, numbered filename (0001-,ADR-001-), sections likeContext / Decision / Consequences - Content: trade-off analysis ending in one chosen path
- Produces: locked decisions (highest precedence by default)
PRD (Product Requirements Document)
- What the product/feature should do, from a user/business perspective
- Hallmarks: user stories, acceptance criteria, success metrics, goals/non-goals, "as a user..." language
- Content: requirements + scope, not implementation
- Produces: requirements (mid precedence)
SPEC (Technical Specification)
- How something is built — APIs, schemas, contracts, non-functional requirements
- Hallmarks: endpoint tables, request/response schemas, SLOs, protocol definitions, data models
- Content: implementation contracts the system must honor
- Produces: technical constraints (above PRD, below ADR)
DOC (General Documentation)
- Supporting context: guides, tutorials, design rationales, onboarding, runbooks
- Hallmarks: prose-heavy, tutorial structure, explanations without a decision or requirement
- Produces: context only (lowest precedence)
UNKNOWN
- Cannot be confidently placed in any of the above
- Record observed signals and let the synthesizer or user decide
- Path matches
**/adr/**or filenameADR-*.mdor0001-*.md…9999-*.md→ strong ADR signal - Path matches
**/prd/**or filenamePRD-*.md→ strong PRD signal - Path matches
**/spec/**,**/specs/**,**/rfc/**or filenameSPEC-*.md/RFC-*.md→ strong SPEC signal - Everything else → unclear, proceed to content analysis
If MANIFEST_TYPE is provided, skip to extract_metadata with that type.
Frontmatter signals (authoritative if present):
type: adr|prd|spec|doc→ use directlystatus: Accepted|Proposed|Superseded|Draft→ ADR signaldecision:field → ADRrequirements:oruser_stories:→ PRD
Content signals:
- Contains
## Decision+## Consequencessections → ADR - Contains
## User StoriesorAs a [user], I wantparagraphs → PRD - Contains endpoint/schema tables, OpenAPI snippets, protocol fields → SPEC
- None of the above, prose only → DOC
Ambiguity rule: If two types compete at roughly equal strength, pick the one with the highest-precedence signal (ADR > SPEC > PRD > DOC). Record the ambiguity in notes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 172 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 66781a17d5e0
gsd-doc-classifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio (11 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,913 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to gsd-doc-classifier, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
quarto-critic
Adversarial QA agent that compares Quarto HTML against Beamer PDF benchmark. Produces harsh, actionable criticism. Does NOT edit files — read-only analysis only.
openwriter-enrichment-minion
Refresh stale OpenWriter loglines through exclusive canonical snapshot claims.
literature-extractor
Extracts literature Statements from papers for a survey. Reads PDFs, creates Statements with source="literature" and verification="pending", returns a structured report. Never registers theme tags, never creates Warrants or Claims.
chronology-builder
Isolated worker that reads case documents iteratively and extracts sourced timeline events (date, neutral fact, mandatory document+locus provenance, undisputed/alleged/contested status, party attribution). Deduplicates and cross-references across documents and languages. Emits events.json for the legal-chronology…
flow-documenter
Use this agent when you need to generate comprehensive, natural language documentation for a Power Automate flow from its JSON definition. This agent should be invoked when:\n\n- A user provides a flow.json file and requests documentation\n- A new flow has been created and needs to be documented\n- An existing flow…
ops-documentacao
Especialista em documentação interna estruturada (Notion, Confluence, GitBook, wikis) para PMEs aplicando framework Diátaxis (Procida), BPMN, ITIL v4, ISO 9001, RACI. Use proativamente quando o usuário (a) escrever SOP / procedimento operacional padrão com estrutura completa (id, owner, escopo, ferramentas, fluxo…