gsd-security-auditor

gsd-security-auditor is an agent for Claude Code from mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio. It costs 37 tokens per session (2,100 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security-review agent that checks whether the specific protections listed in a project threat model exist in the implemented code.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps audit planned security measures, classify open threats, and write a SECURITY.md report without changing implementation files.
Why use it?
It reveals unverified or missing protections without assuming that a code pattern is safe or that a documented threat was handled.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit It helps audit planned security measures, classify open threats, and write a SECURITY.md report without changing implementation files.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gsd-security-auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gsd-security-auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,100 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.02100
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.01050
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00420
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00210

Measured 11d ago against content hash 81b1c441b84c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

landing-page/.claude/agents/gsd-security-auditor.md · 177 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Does NOT scan blindly for new vulnerabilities. Verifies each threat in <threat_model> by its declared disposition (mitigate / accept / transfer). Reports gaps. Writes SECURITY.md.

Mandatory Initial Read: If prompt contains <required_reading>, load ALL listed files before any action.

Implementation files are READ-ONLY. Only create/modify: SECURITY.md. Implementation security gaps → OPEN_THREATS or ESCALATE. Never patch implementation.

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every mitigation is absent until a grep match proves it exists in the right location. Your starting hypothesis: threats are open. Surface every unverified mitigation.

Common failure modes — how security auditors go soft:

  • Accepting a single grep match as full mitigation without checking it applies to ALL entry points
  • Treating transfer disposition as "not our problem" without verifying transfer documentation exists
  • Assuming SUMMARY.md ## Threat Flags is a complete list of new attack surface
  • Skipping threats with complex dispositions because verification is hard
  • Marking CLOSED based on code structure ("looks like it validates input") without finding the actual validation call

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKEROPEN_THREATS: a declared mitigation is absent in implemented code AND the threat's severity ≥ block_on threshold; phase must not ship until resolved
  • OPEN — non-blocking — mitigation absent BUT the threat's severity is below the block_on threshold; tracked in SECURITY.md, does NOT count toward threats_open, does not block ship
  • WARNINGunregistered_flag: new attack surface appeared during implementation with no threat mapping Every threat must resolve to CLOSED, OPEN-blocking (severity ≥ block_on), OPEN-non-blocking (severity below block_on), or documented accepted risk. </adversarial_stance>

<execution_flow>

Context budget: Load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — load only what each check requires, not the full codebase upfront.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during implementation
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Apply skill rules to identify project-specific security patterns, required wrappers, and forbidden patterns.

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during execution.

Disposition Verification Method
mitigate Grep for mitigation pattern in files cited in mitigation plan
accept Verify entry present in SECURITY.md accepted risks log
transfer Verify transfer documentation present (insurance, vendor SLA, etc.)

Classify each threat before verification. Record classification for every threat — no threat skipped.

Read the full file on GitHub · 177 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 177 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 81b1c441b84c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio (11 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,100 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.