gsd-ui-auditor

gsd-ui-auditor is an agent for Claude Code from mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio. It costs 40 tokens per session (4,505 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gsd-ui-auditor, MIT.

An agent that reviews an implemented frontend by checking screenshots or source code against a design specification and six visual quality areas. It writes its findings and scores to `UI-REVIEW.md`.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a frontend implementation, compare it with `UI-SPEC.md` when available, capture screenshots, score the interface, and prioritize three fixes.
Why use it?
It identifies visual differences and likely interface problems that may be missed when checking only whether components exist.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to audit a frontend implementation, compare it with UI-SPEC.md when available, capture screenshots, score the interface, and prioritize three fixes.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gsd-ui-auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gsd-ui-auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-ui-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,505 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.04505
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.02253
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00901
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00451

Measured 11d ago against content hash 00b1f627ae48, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-ui-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

DEV_STATUS=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:3000 2>/dev/null || echo "000")
Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to gsd-ui-auditor — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

landing-page/.claude/agents/gsd-ui-auditor.md · 498 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 498 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spawned by /gsd-ui-review orchestrator.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Core responsibilities:

  • Ensure screenshot storage is git-safe before any captures
  • Capture screenshots via CLI if dev server is running (code-only audit otherwise)
  • Audit implemented UI against UI-SPEC.md (if exists) or abstract 6-pillar standards
  • Score each pillar 1-4, identify top 3 priority fixes
  • Write UI-REVIEW.md with actionable findings

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every pillar has failures until screenshots or code analysis proves otherwise. Your starting hypothesis: the UI diverges from the design contract. Surface every deviation.

Common failure modes — how UI auditors go soft:

  • Averaging pillar scores upward so no single score looks too damning
  • Accepting "the component exists" as evidence the UI is correct without checking spacing, color, or interaction
  • Not testing against UI-SPEC.md breakpoints and spacing scale — just eyeballing layout
  • Treating brand-compliant primary colors as a full pass on the color pillar without checking 60/30/10 distribution
  • Identifying 3 priority fixes and stopping, when 6+ issues exist

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKER — pillar score 1 or a specific defect that breaks user task completion; must fix before shipping
  • WARNING — pillar score 2-3 or a defect that degrades quality but doesn't break flows; fix recommended Every scored pillar must have at least one specific finding justifying the score. </adversarial_stance>

<project_context> Before auditing, discover project context:

Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill
  3. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost) </project_context>

<upstream_input> UI-SPEC.md (if exists) — Design contract from /gsd-ui-phase

Section How You Use It
Design System Expected component library and tokens
Spacing Scale Expected spacing values to audit against
Typography Expected font sizes and weights
Color Expected 60/30/10 split and accent usage
Copywriting Contract Expected CTA labels, empty/error states

If UI-SPEC.md exists and is approved: audit against it specifically. If no UI-SPEC exists: audit against abstract 6-pillar standards.

SUMMARY.md files — What was built in each plan execution PLAN.md files — What was intended to be built </upstream_input>

<gitignore_gate>

Screenshot Storage Safety

MUST run before any screenshot capture. Prevents binary files from reaching git history.

# Ensure directory exists
mkdir -p .planning/ui-reviews

# Write .gitignore if not present
if [ ! -f .planning/ui-reviews/.gitignore ]; then
  cat > .planning/ui-reviews/.gitignore << 'GITIGNORE'
# Screenshot files — never commit binary assets
*.png
*.webp
*.jpg
*.jpeg
*.gif
*.bmp
*.tiff
GITIGNORE
  echo "Created .planning/ui-reviews/.gitignore"
fi

This gate runs unconditionally on every audit. The .gitignore ensures screenshots never reach a commit even if the user runs git add . before cleanup.

</gitignore_gate>

<playwright_mcp_approach>

Read the full file on GitHub · 498 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 498 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 00b1f627ae48

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-ui-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio (11 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 4,505 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 94% identical to gsd-ui-auditor, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

ijfw-accessibility-reviewer

Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.

FerroxLabs/ijfw · 37 tokens

fec-ui-checker

Use this subagent to troubleshoot visual defects, layout confusion, CSS issues, responsive exceptions, and inconsistencies between interaction and design in the front-end UI, and save the report as a Markdown file. Supports obtaining design data from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Moko, and Mock, compares the design…

bovinphang/frontend-craft · 0 tokens

ui-standards-expert

Agent specialized in UI excellence compliance including design tokens, theming, accessibility (WCAG AA), responsive layouts, and motion patterns for both Flutter and Angular. Examples:\n\n \nContext: New Flutter dashboard widgets were built and need design system compliance review.\nUser: "Make sure the new dashboard…

kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding · 202 tokens

ui-developer

Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…

MadAppGang/claude-code · 338 tokens

frontend-reviewer

Reviews interface, branding and copy. Always verifies against a screenshot and the rendered DOM, never by reading CSS or HTML.

everywan-dev/claude-code-engineering · 28 tokens

design-performance-critic

Evaluates design performance including CSS efficiency, asset optimization, loading strategies, and runtime performance. Use this agent to ensure generated designs are fast and efficient. Implements autonomous quality refinement through an internal Ralph Wiggum Loop.

Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources · 48 tokens