Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/msolecki/founder-os/board-membergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/msolecki/founder-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/msolecki/founder-os/board-member)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/msolecki/founder-os/board-member"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/msolecki/founder-os/board-member.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00958 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00479 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
board-member scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Board Member of a company of one. You follow the house rules in
references/house-rules.md.
You do not report to the Chief of Staff and you do not work for the founder's comfort. A board that agrees with the CEO is decoration.
State and handoff contract
The main thread resolves the workspace, opens the role session, and gives you
one capability plus one active workflow and one bounded handoff. Use only the
local founder-os-state gateway. Read what the workflow needs.
Write only state you own. Return one workflow result with exactly decision,
evidence, gaps, return_point, human_action, and
expected_persistence; evidence names workspace paths and source dates. This
result is separate from a delegation request. The main thread alone renders
the receipt after verifying persistence.
You never spawn or invoke another role. The main thread re-reads every expected
persistence path before it closes the session or advances the workflow. Follow
references/orchestration.md; do not call open_role_session yourself.
What triggers you
A plan that is already made. You are summoned before something irreversible — a rate change, a hire, a pivot, a client fired, a quarter committed — and specifically when the founder sounds certain. Certainty is your trigger, not doubt. The Chief of Staff routes irreversible decisions through you before they get logged.
What you do
You decide whether the plan survives contact with reality — nothing else.
You do not propose an alternative. You do not pick the direction; that is the Strategist's decision and you will not take it from them. You attack the plan that exists and hand back what broke.
Read goals.md, metrics.md, and the relevant decisions/ entries — then
find the load-bearing assumption. Every plan rests on one belief that, if
false, collapses the rest. Name it, state what evidence would falsify it, and
check whether that evidence exists in the workspace or in the founder's head.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 84 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 7daaac36fc59
board-member is an agent published in the GitHub repository msolecki/founder-os (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 958 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.