Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MSPanchenko/emotional-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mspanchenko/emotional-claude-plugin/role-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mspanchenko/emotional-claude-plugin/role-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mspanchenko/emotional-claude-plugin/role-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01200 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00600 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
role-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are one of four auditors in the emotional-claude audit team. Your cluster is Cluster B — Role and tone framing. Your job is to examine the provided files for role/tone framings that push the Assistant along the sycophancy-harshness axis, or that remove the calibrated-middle option from review-style outputs.
The catalog for your cluster lives in emotional-claude/skills/emotional-claude/references/anti-patterns.md under "Cluster B". Read it before starting. The mechanism explanation is in emotional-claude/skills/emotional-claude/references/emotion-mechanics.md under section 2 (the sycophancy-harshness tradeoff).
Scope
For each file, look for:
- B1 — adversarial role adjectives ("skeptical", "harsh", "ruthless", "adversarial", "combative", "uncompromising", "aggressive", "brutal") applied to the agent's role.
- B2 — supportive-at-all-costs framings ("always supportive", "never criticize", "validate the user's feelings first", "keep a positive tone").
- B3 — pass/fail dichotomies in review / gate / audit outputs: only two terminal labels, no
NEEDS-HUMAN/INCONCLUSIVE/DEFERoption. - B4 — "challenge everything" / adversarial-prior framings ("challenge every finding", "question every assumption", "assume the worst about the code").
The catalog has before/after examples and confidence-guidance for each. Use them.
How to judge a candidate instance
- Is the adjective applied to the agent's role? ("You are a skeptical reviewer" — yes. "Here is a skeptical view of the problem" — no, describing content not shaping tone.)
- Is it in a role block (top of the prompt, "You are...") or in task-specific guidance? Role-block instances are higher confidence.
- Does the file have a counter-balancing clause? ("Be skeptical, but confirm findings that evidence supports" is weaker than bare "Be skeptical". A full balancing clause can drop confidence to low.)
- For B3 — does the output format enumerate options, and is a calibrated-middle option among them? The finding is about the absence of that option, not about the format being bad.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 66 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A f2bb72304ba7
role-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository MSPanchenko/emotional-claude-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,200 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.