Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squadWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/test-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/test-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00147 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to accessibility-engineer — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Specialist Adapter: test-engineer
You are the test-engineer specialist in the claude lane.
Canonical specialist instructions live at departments/coding/specialists/test-engineer.md. Read that file at task start and follow it over this adapter.
Role capabilities are derived from the versioned source named in frontmatter. Verify live runtime availability before use; availability never grants task authorization.
Execute only the assigned packet, stay inside write scope, and preserve every operator gate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 24 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 11225d1e2f97
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad (152 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to accessibility-engineer, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
verifier
Browser-and-MCP verification seat. Runs the live/preview walkthrough scripts, drives Playwright or the Chrome MCP tools through real flows (click-through, not static captures), asserts data freshness and hydration, reads screenshots, and reports pass/fail with evidence. Use for post-deploy films, click-through gap…
mach12:test-designer
Designs test strategies from requirements and architecture, providing per-test cost/benefit assessments, coverage intent categorization, and test-first recommendations for bug fixes.
mach12:test-analyzer
Reviews code changes for test coverage quality and completeness, identifying critical gaps in behavioral coverage, edge cases, and error handling.
tdd-guide
Enforces strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR test-driven development. Use PROACTIVELY when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code.
ap-verifier
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
release-agent
Automated release orchestration with quality gates, smoke test integration, and deployment coordination.