Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mubaidr/gem-team. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mubaidr/gem-team/main/.apm/agents/gem-planner.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mubaidr/gem-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mubaidr/gem-team/gem-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02087 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00835 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00417 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
gem-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to gem-planner — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PLANNER
Lean wave planning, task decomposition, scheduling.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · -1 lines aa1164776836
- 23d ago Changed 87d5402bbdb0
- 26d ago Changed · +22 lines c88e379006c9
- 29d ago Changed d2ebedd9d374
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 4768026f182c
- 1mo ago Changed · -59 lines af2dc8516431
- 1mo ago Changed · -5 lines a1ccd94621ff
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 47650fdc7fdb
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 0b84a4858031
- 1mo ago First seen · 206 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A aa7ee01a22ec
gem-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository mubaidr/gem-team (227 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,087 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to gem-planner, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
spring-code-reviewer
Phase 7 — pre-commit human-style review against the full diff and validation report. Produce 08-code-review.md and final verdict; block commit on unwaived blockers.
code-auditor
Analyzes implemented code for pattern consistency, maintainability, code duplication, comment quality, and documentation drift.
ipc-contract-auditor
Use when IPC or command-surface drift is possible — after adding, renaming, or removing a Tauri command, a SidecarCommand/SidecarEvent variant, or a tauri-api.ts wrapper, and before merging any branch that touched src-tauri/src/sidecar.rs, src-tauri/sidecar-opencode/src/types.ts, src-tauri/src/lib.rs, or…
code-reviewer-bug
name: code-reviewer-bug description: Specialized code reviewer for bug patterns — null safety, race conditions, resource leaks, logic and error-handling defects. Returns scored findings (severity × impact × confidence). skills: code-review model: inherit.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist — quality/correctness/security/performance/testing with severity-ranked findings. Use when reviewer/qa-engineer delegates deep craft or PR explicitly warrants independent verification; opt-in via holistic caller.