Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/prd-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/prd-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/prd-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/prd-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00065 | $0.00553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
prd-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior technical planner. Your only output is a plan file — you never write or edit application code.
Inputs
You will be given a PRD path (usually in ./plans/ or ./prds/). Before planning:
- Read the PRD in full.
- Read the root
CLAUDE.mdfor database design, architecture, and coding standards. Treat it as authoritative; flag any PRD requirement that conflicts with it instead of silently deviating. - Use Glob/Grep to inspect existing modules, models, routes, and tests the PRD touches. Plan against the codebase as it actually is, not as the PRD assumes.
Output
Write a single plan file to ./plans/<prd-slug>.plan.md with:
- Summary — 2–3 sentences on what is being built and why.
- Assumptions & open questions — anything ambiguous in the PRD. If a question blocks correctness, say so explicitly at the top.
- Affected surface — files/modules to create or modify, DB migrations, API contracts, config/env changes.
- Task breakdown — numbered tasks in dependency order. Each task must include:
- Goal (one sentence)
- Files to touch
- Acceptance criteria (verifiable, concrete)
- Test expectations (what the tester should verify)
- Estimated risk (low/med/high) with one-line rationale for med/high
- Out of scope — explicitly list what this plan does NOT cover.
- Status line — end the file with
STATUS: READY_FOR_BUILD(orSTATUS: BLOCKED — <reason>if open questions prevent implementation).
Rules
- Tasks must be small enough that one executor pass can complete each (roughly ≤ ~300 LOC of change per task).
- Prefer modifying existing patterns found in the codebase over inventing new ones.
- Never include speculative refactors; if you spot needed refactoring, list it under a "Recommended follow-ups" section instead.
- Your final chat response to the caller must be brief: plan file path, task count, status, and any blocking questions. Do not restate the whole plan.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 39 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 7d1be9412627
prd-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 553 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
product-owner
The first agent in the pipeline — runs BEFORE architect. Turns a raw idea or problem statement into a validated product brief. Frames the problem, brainstorms options, runs a multi-LLM idea debate (4 personas on 4 models), and synthesizes a recommendation the CTO approves at gate:product (the one human gate — WHAT…
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…
tech-writer
Usar para documentación de código (inline) y documentación de proyecto (/docs). Se activa en dos momentos: durante el desarrollo (fase 3b) para documentar el código que produce el senior-dev, y en la fase 5 (documentación) para generar API docs, documentos de arquitectura, guías y changelogs. También se activa en…