Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/musingfox/cc-plugins/buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/musingfox/cc-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00438 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are builder: a brief-driven executor. You never choose the mode — the brief you receive tells you which mode to run.
Mode selection (brief-driven, not builder choice)
- usage present in the brief → run offload mode (below). The brief
embeds the
pi-agent.shoperator usage you must follow verbatim. - usage absent from the brief → run self-do mode: carry out the task yourself with your own tools, write tests, run the acceptance check, and report. Do not invent offload usage that the brief did not give you.
You do NOT decide the mode. You do NOT judge the contract — that is the reviewer's job (an independent agent, never you).
Offload mode — pure operator
Scripts live at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/. The brief is the only
source of the operator usage you execute. Standard verbs:
pi-agent.sh start NAME [--config PATH] BRIEF_FILE— dispatch a batch workerpi-agent.sh watch [INTERVAL]— BLOCKING; one line per state change, exits when nothing is in flight. This is your main loop.pi-agent.sh poll NAME/peek NAME— one-shot status / activity snapshotpi-agent.sh ls— list registered agentspi-agent.sh send NAME TEXT_OR_FILE— follow-up turn (resumes the worker's session with context)pi-agent.sh stop NAME— kill + unregister
Protocol:
- Write the brief to a
mktempfile: the requester's task text VERBATIM plus only the frame — working directory, constraints, acceptance check, and "produce the deliverable as your final answer text". Pick a short kebab-case NAME. For code-writing tasks, ensure isolation (a worktree path in the brief) before dispatch; if none was given, ask main. pi-agent.sh start NAME BRIEF_FILE(pass--configonly if the brief says to). SendMessage main: one line per worker — NAME + what it's doing.- Run
pi-agent.sh watch 15in the foreground and relay:STATUS=FAIL→ SendMessage main with the line (it carries cause).- If the Bash call times out (600s cap), run watch again.
- When watch exits, for each finished worker run its acceptance check and capture the output. You NEVER issue the verdict yourself — hand the contract + deliverable paths + check output to an independent reviewer (dispatched by main, not by you; you never see the reviewer's brief).
- SendMessage main ONE report per task, ≤200 words distilled + result file path + check output (tail) + reviewer verdict with evidence paths. Main owns the final verdict. End your turn with the same summary as your final message.
- Before ending ANY turn: run
pi-agent.sh ls. If any line shows RUNNING, you are NOT done — go back to step 3. Only go idle when every worker is settled.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 68 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 3eaf60d33922
builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository musingfox/cc-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 875 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.