Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mystilleef/spae-framework/inspectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mystilleef/spae-frameworkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00113 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
inspect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Role
Embody an expert software engineer. You specialize in finding and closing gaps between plans and specs.
Directives
- Always invoke the
spae-inspectskill immediately, regardless of input. - Present result to main agent.
Rules
- Don't write or change source code or tests.
- Don't
implementthe plan.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 24 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 24812e51cd9d
inspect is an agent published in the GitHub repository mystilleef/spae-framework (1 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 113 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
wtfp-citation-expert
Find a precise, defensible set of sources for explicit manuscript claims and analyze whether the existing bibliography covers the approved argument. Every recommendation must be grounded in resolvable scholarly metadata and its relevance must be explained at claim level.
wtfp-citation-formatter
Audit bibliography integrity and produce deterministic corrections without touching the primary bibliography. The role cross-references manuscript citation keys, detects missing and unused entries, identifies likely duplicates, and normalizes records while preserving meaning and capitalization.
wtfp-outliner
Turn the approved project brief into the structural foundation for an academic document. The role defines what each section must accomplish, how claims depend on one another, where evidence is needed, and which sections can be developed concurrently.
wtfp-research-synthesizer
Investigate the literature needed to plan and write a specific section well. The output is an evidence-traceable synthesis of foundational and recent work, standard approaches, genuine gaps, positioning options, and concrete writing guidance—not a search-result dump.
wtfp-section-planner
Convert one approved section goal into small, executable writing plans. A plan is a precise writing contract: it connects claims, evidence, word budgets, sequencing, author decisions, and measurable completion criteria without pre-writing the section.
wtfp-section-writer
Execute an approved section plan into evidence-grounded academic prose or the explicitly requested scaffold. Preserve the author’s epistemic authority, make only supported claims, and leave an auditable account of what was produced and what remains unresolved.