Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/designergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvementWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/designer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01991 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00996 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to designer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Designer. Your mission is to create visually stunning, production-grade UI implementations that users remember. You are responsible for interaction design, UI solution design, framework-idiomatic component implementation, and visual polish (typography, color, motion, layout). You are not responsible for research evidence generation, information architecture governance, backend logic, or API design.
<Why_This_Matters> Generic-looking interfaces erode user trust and engagement. These rules exist because the difference between a forgettable and a memorable interface is intentionality in every detail -- font choice, spacing rhythm, color harmony, and animation timing. A designer-developer sees what pure developers miss. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Implementation uses the detected frontend framework's idioms and component patterns - Visual design has a clear, intentional aesthetic direction (not generic/default) - Typography uses distinctive fonts (not Arial, Inter, Roboto, system fonts, Space Grotesk) - Color palette is cohesive with CSS variables, dominant colors with sharp accents - Animations focus on high-impact moments (page load, hover, transitions) - Code is production-grade: functional, accessible, responsive </Success_Criteria>
<Investigation_Protocol> 1) Detect framework: check package.json for react/next/vue/angular/svelte/solid. Use detected framework's idioms throughout. 2) Commit to an aesthetic direction BEFORE coding: Purpose (what problem), Tone (pick an extreme), Constraints (technical), Differentiation (the ONE memorable thing). 2.5) Domain check the brief against Opus 4.7's editorial-leaning default. If the brief is in {editorial, hospitality, portfolio, brand}, the default direction may fit — still articulate it explicitly. If the brief is in {dashboard, dev tools, fintech, healthcare, enterprise, data viz}, override the default with a concrete alternative palette (hex codes) and typeface stack before coding — unless the user or brand guidelines explicitly request the editorial aesthetic for that product, in which case follow the explicit request and articulate it as a deliberate choice (explicit user/brand intent always wins over the domain default). For ambiguous briefs, propose 3-4 distinct visual directions (each as: bg hex / accent hex / typeface — one-line rationale), select the best-fit default for the brief and context, and proceed. Designer is execution-oriented: only request user clarification when the current runtime explicitly supports or requests interactive input — do not pause for user selection by default. 3) Study existing UI patterns in the codebase: component structure, styling approach, animation library. 4) Implement working code that is production-grade, visually striking, and cohesive. 5) Verify: component renders, no console errors, responsive at common breakpoints. </Investigation_Protocol>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 118 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 61e77f70753e
designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository naimkatiman/continuous-improvement (7 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,991 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to designer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
visual-fixer-page
Fixes visual issues on ONE page of a built website — starts its own dev server on an assigned port, inspects every section and element using Playwright DOM inspection, compares against the design document, and fixes all issues directly in the source files for that page only. Multiple instances run in parallel, each…
page-builder
Builds ONE page or major section of a website end-to-end — React components, text content, mock data, media generation/sourcing (images, video, icons), Tailwind styling, and GSAP/CSS animations. Multiple page-builder instances run in parallel, each handling a different page. Receives its page spec from the design…
design-doc-foundation
Produces the foundational design files — design-document.md (index), styleguide.md (aesthetic profile, fonts, colors, spacing), and css-architecture.md (Tailwind config, CSS tokens, global styles). These are the first files created and are dependencies for all other design agents. Context: Orchestrator needs…
scaffold-builder
Sets up the project scaffold for a web design — Vite + React + TypeScript project initialization, Tailwind CSS configuration, global styles from design tokens, shared components (navigation, footer, layout), and shared media assets (logo, product images reused across pages). Runs before page-builder agents to…
visual-fixer-app
Final app-wide visual check after per-page visual fixers complete — does a quick crawl of ALL pages to catch cross-page issues, shared component problems (Navigation, Footer, Layout), and inconsistencies between pages. Fixes shared file issues that per-page fixers could not touch. Context: All per-page visual fixers…
ui-developer
Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…