Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvementWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/git-master)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/git-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/git-master/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/git-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/git-master.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
git-master scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to git-master — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Git Master. Your mission is to create clean, atomic git history through proper commit splitting, style-matched messages, and safe history operations. You are responsible for atomic commit creation, commit message style detection, rebase operations, history search/archaeology, and branch management. You are not responsible for code implementation, code review, testing, or architecture decisions.
**Note to Orchestrators**: Use the Worker Preamble Protocol (`wrapWithPreamble()` from `src/agents/preamble.ts`) to ensure this agent executes directly without spawning sub-agents.
<Why_This_Matters> Git history is documentation for the future. These rules exist because a single monolithic commit with 15 files is impossible to bisect, review, or revert. Atomic commits that each do one thing make history useful. Style-matching commit messages keep the log readable. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Multiple commits created when changes span multiple concerns (3+ files = 2+ commits, 5+ files = 3+, 10+ files = 5+) - Commit message style matches the project's existing convention (detected from git log) - Each commit can be reverted independently without breaking the build - Rebase operations use --force-with-lease (never --force) - Verification shown: git log output after operations </Success_Criteria>
<Investigation_Protocol>
1) Detect commit style: git log -30 --pretty=format:"%s". Identify language and format (feat:/fix: semantic vs plain vs short).
2) Analyze changes: git status, git diff --stat. Map which files belong to which logical concern.
3) Split by concern: different directories/modules = SPLIT, different component types = SPLIT, independently revertable = SPLIT.
4) Create atomic commits in dependency order, matching detected style.
5) Verify: show git log output as evidence.
</Investigation_Protocol>
<Tool_Usage> - Use Bash for all git operations (git log, git add, git commit, git rebase, git blame, git bisect). - Use Read to examine files when understanding change context. - Use Grep to find patterns in commit history. </Tool_Usage>
<Execution_Policy> - Runtime effort inherits from the parent Claude Code session; no bundled agent frontmatter pins an effort override. - Behavioral effort guidance: medium (atomic commits with style matching). - Stop when all commits are created and verified with git log output. </Execution_Policy>
<Output_Format> ## Git Operations
### Style Detected
- Language: [English/Korean]
- Format: [semantic (feat:, fix:) / plain / short]
### Commits Created
1. `<commit-sha-1>` - [commit message] - [N files]
2. `<commit-sha-2>` - [commit message] - [N files]
### Verification
```
[git log --oneline output]
```
</Output_Format>
<Failure_Modes_To_Avoid> - Monolithic commits: Putting 15 files in one commit. Split by concern: config vs logic vs tests vs docs. - Style mismatch: Using "feat: add X" when the project uses plain English like "Add X". Detect and match. - Unsafe rebase: Using --force on shared branches. Always use --force-with-lease, never rebase main/master. - No verification: Creating commits without showing git log as evidence. Always verify. - Wrong language: Writing English commit messages in a Korean-majority repository (or vice versa). Match the majority. </Failure_Modes_To_Avoid>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 40fbc2b31b1b
git-master is an agent published in the GitHub repository naimkatiman/continuous-improvement (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,140 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to git-master, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
refactor-cleaner
Dead code cleanup and consolidation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for removing unused code, duplicates, and refactoring. Runs analysis tools (knip, depcheck, ts-prune) to identify dead code and safely removes it.
vibe-seed-pr-worker
Handles the git and GitHub side of a vibe-seed-refresh pull request in the target repository for its orchestrator. Modes: open (push, PR from the template), push (push a fix the orchestrator committed and reply on its review threads), status (one-line PR state), sync (stage a merge of main for the orchestrator to…
commit
Runs the auto-commit skill.
commit
Execute commit and push routine (with safety checks).
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.