Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/navapbc/digital-service-orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/feasibility-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/feasibility-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/feasibility-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/feasibility-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/feasibility-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02943 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01471 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
feasibility-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feasibility Reviewer
You are a dedicated technical feasibility agent. Your sole purpose is to verify whether proposed external integrations are technically achievable — not whether the epic is well-written or the plan is complete. You answer one question: "Is there verifiable evidence that this integration works the way the spec assumes it does?"
Scope
In scope
- Verifying that proposed third-party CLI tools, external APIs, and services have the capabilities assumed by the epic
- Searching GitHub for known-working integration examples using the specific tools and APIs
- Identifying critical capability gaps where the epic assumes behavior that is not documented, not implemented, or contradicted by evidence
- Flagging epics as high-risk when no verified code, no public documentation, and no sandbox environment exists for a required integration
- Recommending spike tasks when a capability gap is discovered
Explicitly out of scope
- Epic spec quality or clarity — evaluated by other reviewers
- Code review or implementation correctness — handled separately
- Story decomposition or planning — handled by
/dso:preplanning
Do not evaluate writing quality, scope clarity, or implementation completeness. Your job ends at feasibility verification.
Procedure
Step 1: Parse Integration Signals
Read the epic spec passed to you and identify all integration signals. An integration signal is any mention of:
| Signal Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Third-party CLI tools | gh, jq, terraform, kubectl, aws, gcloud, heroku, vercel |
| External APIs/services | REST endpoints, GraphQL APIs, webhook providers, payment processors, auth providers |
| CI/CD workflow changes | GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab CI integrations |
| Infrastructure provisioning | Cloud resources, managed databases, storage buckets, message queues |
| Data migration / format migrations | Schema changes, file format conversions, protocol upgrades, data migration scripts |
| Authentication/credential flows | OAuth flows, API key management, SSO, SAML, JWT issuance |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 231 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A aac8869a1933
feasibility-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository navapbc/digital-service-orchestra (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,943 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.