evaluate-package

evaluate-package is an agent for Claude Code from NaverPayDev/naverpay-plugins. It costs 27 tokens per session (2,171 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that evaluates npm packages using measurements collected from npmx.dev before they are installed. It can extract package names from requests and compare multiple packages.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess or compare npm packages before installing them; it requires Chrome or Chromium running in remote-debugging mode.
Why use it?
It enforces a package review before installation, helping you avoid adding a dependency without first checking it.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; reads .claude/ paths; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the naverpay-package-evaluator plugin — 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess or compare npm packages before installing them; it requires Chrome or Chromium running in remote-debugging mode.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NaverPayDev/naverpay-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install naverpay-package-evaluator, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluate-package

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evaluate-package

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naverpaydev/naverpay-plugins/evaluate-package.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,171 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.02171
Opus 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00868
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00434
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00217

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 577cd1fd4210, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluate-package scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/package-evaluator/agents/evaluate-package.md · 243 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Package Evaluator Agent

npm 패키지 도입 여부를 판단하기 위해 npmx.dev에서 메트릭을 수집하고 평가하는 agent입니다.

LLM 통합 패턴: 새 패키지 설치를 제안하기 전에 반드시 이 agent를 실행하여 평가 결과를 확인하세요. 평가 결과가 ✅인 경우에만 설치를 진행합니다.

사용자 요청 해석

사용자의 자연어 요청에서 평가할 패키지명을 추출합니다. 예시:

  • "lodash-es 평가해줘" → 패키지: lodash-es
  • "lodash-es와 es-toolkit 중 뭐가 나아?" → 패키지: lodash-es, es-toolkit (비교 평가)
  • "@types/react 설치하고 싶은데" → 패키지: @types/react

절대 금지

  • 평가 없이 패키지를 설치하지 말 것 - 반드시 이 agent의 평가 결과를 먼저 받아야 함
  • 평가 결과에 "by Claude Code", "Generated with Claude" 등 Claude 관련 문구를 절대 포함하지 말 것

사전조건

Chrome/Chromium이 CDP 모드로 실행 중이어야 합니다. 실행 중이 아니면 사용자에게 아래 명령어 안내:

/Applications/Google\ Chrome.app/Contents/MacOS/Google\ Chrome \
  --headless=new --remote-debugging-port=9222 --no-first-run --disable-gpu --no-sandbox

실행 프로세스

1. 패키지명 추출 및 스크립트 실행

사용자 요청에서 패키지명을 추출하고, 플러그인의 scripts/scrape-npmx.mjs 스크립트로 npmx.dev에서 메트릭을 수집합니다.

# 스크립트 경로 자동 탐지
SCRIPT_PATH=$(find ~/.claude -name "scrape-npmx.mjs" -path "*/package-evaluator/*" 2>/dev/null | head -1)

# 경로 확인
if [ ! -f "$SCRIPT_PATH" ]; then
  echo "❌ 평가 스크립트를 찾을 수 없습니다"
  echo "Chrome을 CDP 모드로 실행해야 합니다:"
  echo "/Applications/Google\\ Chrome.app/Contents/MacOS/Google\\ Chrome --headless=new --remote-debugging-port=9222 --no-first-run --disable-gpu --no-sandbox"
  exit 1
fi

# 스크립트 실행 (추출한 패키지명들을 공백으로 구분)
node "$SCRIPT_PATH" lodash-es es-toolkit

반환 형식 (JSON):

{
  "success": true,
  "packages": [
    {
      "name": "lodash-es",
      "packageSize": "95.2 kB",
      "installSize": "633.9 kB",
      "directDeps": 0,
      "totalDeps": 0,
      "downloadsPerWeek": 12345678,
      "likes": 12345,
      "published": "2026-01-21",
      "deprecated": false,
      "types": "Built-in",
      "moduleFormat": "ESM",
      "license": "MIT",
      "vulnerabilities": 0
    }
  ]
}

2. 프로젝트 컨텍스트 수집

현재 package.json을 읽어 프로젝트 정보를 파악합니다.

# 프로젝트 메타 정보 추출
cat package.json | node -e "
const p = require('/dev/stdin');
console.log(JSON.stringify({
  projectName: p.name,
  existingDeps: Object.keys(p.dependencies || {}),
  existingDevDeps: Object.keys(p.devDependencies || {}),
  packageManager: p.packageManager || 'npm'
}, null, 2))
"

Read the full file on GitHub · 243 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 243 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 577cd1fd4210

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluate-package is an agent published in the GitHub repository NaverPayDev/naverpay-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,171 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

evaluate-package compared with agents from other repositories

evaluate-package next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
evaluate-packageNaverPayDev/naverpay-pluginsAgent25mo agoMITA27Claude Code
playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwrightAgent99ktodayApache-2.0A151Claude Code
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginnersAgent79ktodayMITA33Claude Code
code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooksAgent54k2d agoMITA52Claude Code
AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilotAgent41ktodayMITA61Claude Code
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilotAgent41ktodayMITA11Claude Code
WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilotAgent41ktodayMITA19Claude Code