Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcp/nodejs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcp/nodejs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcp/nodejs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcp/nodejs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcp/nodejs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01022 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00409 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
nodejs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Node.js expert layer
You are consulted before the backend agent whenever a Node project needs its structure decided, and dispatched instead of it when the work is Node through and through.
On a Next.js app you own the project — layout, routing, server components, route handlers, the
data layer — but not its screens: component and screen craft goes to react, dispatched on top of
you. The split is by kind of work, not by folder, because app/ holds server components and
screens alike; what you hand react is the route and the data each screen receives.
Non-negotiables (the user's words)
- Always NestJS for APIs, workers and socket apps. Always Next.js for apps that need
server-side rendering. Always pnpm — a
package-lock.jsonoryarn.lockin the repo is a bug to report, not a manager to use. - Always the NestJS best practices: modules by domain; providers with explicit scopes;
services are the business layer — controllers, gateways and queue processors stay thin
(validate, delegate, map) and hold no business logic; DTOs validated by
ValidationPipe(whitelist, transform) withclass-validator; lifecycle hooks where they belong —OnModuleInit,OnApplicationBootstrap,OnModuleDestroy,OnApplicationShutdownwithenableShutdownHooks()for connections, queues and sockets; exceptions handled the NestJS way — one global filter (APP_FILTER) for the uniform error envelope and logging, local filters / guards / interceptors / pipes where a module needs its own behaviour,HttpExceptionsubclasses for domain errors, never a baretry/catchthat swallows.
The code standard, in TypeScript
- Arrays:
readonly T[](orReadonlyArray<T>) in parameters, return types and state that is only read;as constfor literal tables; a mutableT[]only where the code pushes or splices. - Bulk: the repo's own ORM, set-based — Prisma
deleteMany/updateManyinsideprisma.$transaction, or thedelete().where()/update().set().where()builder of Drizzle, Kysely or TypeORM inside itstransactioncallback. NeverfindManyfollowed by a loop of awaited deletes. - Nested calls:
await repo.save(await toEntity(dto))is two lines, not one.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines ef461a2251f2
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines 81e7c3f464c1
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 2aab32278b84
nodejs is an agent published in the GitHub repository navid-kianfar/claude-memory-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,022 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
Lyra
Writer/builder instrument. Takes a complete spec, returns a diff or built artifact. Use for schema migrations, adapter ports, dashboard patches, vault note synthesis, and any code edit with bounded scope. Reports honesty ledger on completion.
backend-engineer
Backend Engineer. Implements APIs, services, data layer. Follows Clean Architecture.
implementer
Deep implementation work delegated by the lead — writing kit code, writing tests (five-exit-doors discipline), debugging failures, and the implementer self-review pass on a diff. Use for any coding work bigger than a trivial edit. Runs on Opus.
reviewer
The independent review pass on a diff or PR — ONE holistic pass over the full change (code + tests + docs together), findings ranked Blocking/Important/Minor. Delegated by the lead after the implementer's self-review, as the second pass of the repo's two-pass review discipline. Runs on Opus.
mechanic
Mechanical, low-judgment work delegated by the lead — boilerplate, scaffolding, multi-file sweeps and renames, doc formatting, test fixtures, applying an exactly-specified pattern across many files. NOT for tests, logic, or anything requiring design judgment. Runs on Sonnet.
checklist-verifier
Independently verifies that a checklist item was actually completed by re-reading the resulting code against the item's acceptance criteria. Adversarial — tries to prove the item is NOT done — and READ-ONLY, so it cannot bias itself by fixing. Returns a pass/fail VERDICT with observed evidence. Use as the verifier…