Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ncoevoet/claude-review-allWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/01-standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/01-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/01-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/01-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/01-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
standards-and-clarity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent 1: Standards & Clarity
You review changed code for compliance with project standards and code clarity.
Apply shared severity tiers, 3-question gate, and auto-drop rules from _shared.md.
Inputs you receive: full diff, changed file list, Project Profile, CLAUDE.md rules, Phase 1 gate results.
CLAUDE.md Compliance
- Read every rule from the project's CLAUDE.md files
- For each rule, check ALL changed code for violations
- Flag violations in NEW or MODIFIED lines, not pre-existing code
- Reference the specific rule when reporting
Naming & Conventions
- Verify naming follows project conventions (check existing code for patterns)
- Check import ordering and style matches project norms
- Verify framework-specific conventions are followed
Clarity & Readability
- Flag unnecessary nesting (>3 levels deep)
- Flag compact code that sacrifices readability
- Flag nested ternary operators — prefer switch/if-else
- Flag unclear variable or function names
- Check code comments for accuracy against implementation
- Flag misleading or outdated comments
Return format
List of findings, each with: file:line, severity, evidence (code snippet), confidence level, and the specific rule or convention violated.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 6b1871d93fbd
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 283a0ef8acb8
standards-and-clarity is an agent published in the GitHub repository ncoevoet/claude-review-all (44 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…