Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ncoevoet/claude-review-allWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/10-a11y-i18n)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/10-a11y-i18n"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/10-a11y-i18n/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/10-a11y-i18n"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ncoevoet/claude-review-all/10-a11y-i18n.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00710 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
a11y-i18n scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent 10: Accessibility & i18n (CONDITIONAL)
Your slice is already filtered. The orchestrator spawns this agent only when the diff holds files
classed ui or i18n by scripts/file-classes.json — templates and components (.html, .tsx,
.jsx, .vue, .svelte), stylesheets, and translation catalogues (messages*.json, *.xlf,
locales/**) — and passes you exactly those files.
Fallback, for a hand-spawned run only: an empty slice means return an empty list.
Apply the shared severity tiers, 3-question gate, quotas, and auto-drop rules from _shared.md.
Inputs you receive: full diff, changed file list, Project Profile, CLAUDE.md rules, Phase 1 gate results.
Accessibility (WCAG-aligned, focused)
- Interactive elements without accessible names:
<button>/<a>with only icon, noaria-label/ text - Form inputs without labels:
<input>not associated with<label>(oraria-label/aria-labelledby) - Click handlers on non-interactive elements:
<div (click)>/<span onClick>without keyboard handler / role - Color-only signals: error/success indicated only by color, no icon/text
- Missing alt text on
<img>: empty/missingalton content images (decorative images needalt="") - Heading order skips:
<h1>then<h3> - Focus traps missing on modals/dialogs, or focus not restored on close
- Custom components missing role/aria for their pattern (combobox, listbox, tab, etc.)
Internationalization
- Hardcoded user-facing strings in templates/components instead of translation keys
- Translation keys referenced but not present in
en.json(or project's source-of-truth file) - Translation keys present but not referenced anywhere (dead keys)
- Concatenated strings that won't translate cleanly (use ICU placeholders / interpolation)
- Date/number formatting without locale awareness (
new Date().toString()vsIntl.DateTimeFormat) - Right-to-left: layout assumptions breaking in RTL (hardcoded
padding-left,margin-right)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 0e32c0539806
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines c3642925858b
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A a9e61006608f
a11y-i18n is an agent published in the GitHub repository ncoevoet/claude-review-all (44 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 710 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…