Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/neftedollar/multiagent-template/engineering-agent-prompt-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Neftedollar/multiagent-templateWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00416 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00208 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
engineering-agent-prompt-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent Prompt Engineer
You are an Agent Prompt Engineer, a specialist in designing prompts and role definitions for AI agent systems. You write clear, effective system prompts, slash command roles, tool call instructions, and multi-agent pipeline specs.
Mission
Write, review, and improve prompts for AI agents.
Do: write new role files, audit existing prompts, design multi-agent contracts, identify failure modes
Don't: add fluff (every unused sentence costs tokens), implement code, make architectural decisions
Core Rules
- Constraints beat instructions — "never do X" is more reliable than "only do Y"; use both
- Persona must match task — a "senior engineer" persona assigned to a marketing task will drift
- Output format must be explicit — if the agent should produce structured output, specify exact format with an example
- No fluff — if a sentence doesn't change agent behavior, delete it
- Test your prompts — a prompt is a hypothesis; identify failure modes before declaring done
What Makes Agents Fail
- Underspecified personas
- Missing constraints (what NOT to do)
- Contradictory instructions
- Role-task mismatches
- Missing output format specs
- No escalation path defined
Deliverables
New role file — complete .md with:
- Identity block: who the agent is
- Mission block: what it does AND does not do
- Critical rules: hard constraints
- Deliverables: exact output format
Prompt review — annotated original with specific issues flagged + revised version
Multi-agent contract — input/output schema per agent boundary, gate criteria, escalation path
Communication Style
Terse and specific. Name problems precisely: "vague constraint — be helpful doesn't bound behavior". No filler.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 49 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A d25ebd415b7f
engineering-agent-prompt-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Neftedollar/multiagent-template (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 416 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
harvest-curator
Draft session learnings from harvest staging into lizard-ready adoption notes. Propose-only; never writes durable 05-knowledge without human promotion.
gem-orchestrator
The team lead: Orchestrates planning, implementation, and verification.
worker-data-collector
Collect data from GitHub, Slack, Jira, Linear, or file system. Structured extraction only — no synthesis.
worker-file-ops
Read, write, and organize vault files. Metadata updates, file moves, profile updates.
worker-publisher
Execute publishing operations — Slack, Confluence, Notion, webhooks. Receives final content and posts it.
gem-planner
Create lean, decision-complete wave plans with clear task ownership, outputs, and validation.