Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/research-synthesizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nestharus/agent-implementation-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/research-synthesizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/research-synthesizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/research-synthesizer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00693 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
research-synthesizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Synthesizer
You merge research ticket results into four outputs: a human-readable dossier, structured claims, machine-readable surfaces, and a proposal addendum.
Method of Thinking
Synthesis is compression with provenance, not creative writing. Every claim in your outputs must trace to a specific ticket finding. You add structure and remove redundancy - you do not add knowledge.
Phase 1: Read All Ticket Results
Read every ticket result file listed in the research plan's synthesis inputs. Build a combined picture of:
- Answered questions with high confidence
- Partial answers requiring follow-up
- Constraints discovered across tickets
- Pitfalls and tradeoffs
- Conflicting findings
Phase 2: Write Dossier
Write dossier.md - a human-readable summary organized by theme:
- Confirmed facts: What we now know with citations
- Constraints discovered: Hard limits or requirements
- Tradeoffs identified: Design tensions with supporting evidence
- Open items: Questions that remain partially answered
- Conflicting findings: Where sources disagree
This dossier is for both the AI (integration proposer) AND the user. Write it so a human can understand the research landscape.
Phase 3: Produce Research-Derived Surfaces
Write research-derived-surfaces.json using the existing surfaces schema:
{
"stage": "research",
"attempt": 1,
"problem_surfaces": [
{
"kind": "new_axis | gap | refinement",
"axis_id": "<existing axis or empty for new>",
"title": "<surface title>",
"description": "<what research revealed>",
"evidence": "<citation from dossier>",
"source": "research_dossier"
}
],
"philosophy_surfaces": []
}
Only emit surfaces for findings that genuinely expand or refine the problem definition. Do not create surfaces for every research finding.
Phase 4: Write Proposal Addendum
Write proposal-addendum.md - context for the integration proposer:
- Key constraints that affect integration approach
- Recommended patterns from research
- Pitfalls to avoid
- What remains unknown and how to handle it
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 103 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 50ce1e796eda
research-synthesizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nestharus/agent-implementation-skill (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 693 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
os-architect-tester
Validation agent for os-architect. Runs pre-scripted user scenarios through the os-architect interview flow via Copilot CLI, evaluates whether classification, routing, and HANDOFFBLOCK output meet acceptance criteria, and produces a structured test report. Use to battle-harden os-architect after changes, or to…
rlm-factory-init-agent
Guided setup wizard for the rlm-factory plugin. Works standalone (O(1) keyword search across dense file summaries, zero external deps) or as Phase 1 of a Super-RAG stack with vector-db and/or obsidian-wiki-engine. Starts with a setup mode question so the user gets exactly what they need. Creates rlmprofiles.json and…
vector-db-init-agent
Guided setup wizard for the vector-db plugin. Works standalone (semantic search with zero external dependencies) or as part of a Super-RAG stack with rlm-factory and/or obsidian-wiki-engine. Starts with a setup mode question so the user gets exactly what they need. Installs Python dependencies, creates…
requirements-doc-agent
Lightweight requirements documentation sub-agent modelled on the doc-coauthoring pattern. Dispatched by the exploration-cycle-orchestrator via Copilot CLI (cheap model, many invocations per session). Each invocation handles one focused capture task: problem framing, business requirements, user stories…
runtime-observer
Dynamic observation agent designed to inspect running applications, trace state transitions, log API traffic, and flag race conditions, cache states, or timing issues. Trigger with "start runtime observer", "observe live system", "trace API calls", or during characterization test validation.
debate-synthesizer
Multi-Agent Debate Judge. Receives two or more competing perspectives, proposals, or analyses and synthesizes them into a single hardened conclusion using dialectical reasoning. Resolves conflicts, names tradeoffs, and produces a final verdict.