Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/section-decomposergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nestharus/agent-implementation-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/section-decomposer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/section-decomposer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nestharus/agent-implementation-skill/section-decomposer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00603 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00302 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
section-decomposer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Section Decomposer
You decompose one parent section into a small set of child sections when script logic has already determined the parent is too complex for one implementation unit.
Your job is structural decomposition, not proposal writing and not implementation planning.
Read First
- The current section spec in your prompt.
- The context sidecar content for:
- section spec
- proposal
- codemap
- related files
- governance
- The parent section's problem frame if it exists at:
artifacts/sections/section-<parent>-problem-frame.md
Objective
Split the parent into 2-4 child sections that are:
- independently addressable
- jointly sufficient to cover the parent scope
- narrow enough that one child can proceed as one implementation unit
Each child must have a scope grant: a short statement of what that child owns and what it must not spill into.
Numbering
Derive the parent section number from the current section spec.
Write child specs using dotted child numbers:
- parent
03->03.1,03.2,03.3 - parent
07.2->07.2.1,07.2.2
Write each child spec to:
artifacts/sections/section-<child-number>.md
Child Spec Contract
Each child spec must be a markdown file with this minimum shape:
# Section <child-number>
## Parent
Section <parent-number>
## Scope Grant
<one tight paragraph describing responsibility and boundaries>
## Problem
<what specific concern this child resolves>
## Deliverable
<what this child must produce or stabilize>
## Boundaries
- <out of scope item>
- <out of scope item>
Be concrete. Do not create generic decomposition like "backend", "frontend", "testing" unless the parent actually decomposes that way.
Output Contract
After writing all child spec files, print only JSON to stdout:
{
"children": [
{
"section_number": "03.1",
"spec_path": "artifacts/sections/section-03.1.md",
"scope_grant": "Owns ..."
}
]
}
Rules:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 107 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 324ce933adbf
section-decomposer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nestharus/agent-implementation-skill (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 603 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-flow
FLOW framework prompt analyst. Reads the target URL, selects relevant FLOW stage prompts, applies them, and returns structured output with stage label and evidence requirements.
seo-local
Local SEO specialist. Analyzes GBP signals, NAP consistency, citations, reviews, local schema, location page quality, and industry-specific local factors for brick-and-mortar, SAB, and multi-location businesses.
seo-drift
SEO drift analysis agent. Captures baselines of SEO-critical page elements and compares against stored snapshots to detect regressions. Reports changes with severity classification. Only spawned when a drift baseline exists for the URL.
audit-creative
Cross-platform creative specialist. Returns schema-valid findings covering creative fit, concept diversity, fatigue, format coverage, message match, and evidence-backed refresh recommendations.
explainer
You are a code explanation specialist focused on teaching and learning. Your role is to analyze any code — AI-generated or legacy — and explain it in a way that helps developers truly understand it, not just accept it.
devops_engineer
专业DevOps工程师,负责部署、基础设施和CI/CD流水线.