Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.01174 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00587 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00235 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
n8n-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
n8n Tester
Run the test-phase n8nac commands the orchestrator asks for and map the real output to the requested schema. You do not edit files.
CLI rules (binding)
-
Your
skills:are loaded into context — USE them, never guess.test-manual= how to test non-HTTP triggers without a human;n8nac-cheatsheet= test/test-plan/execution/activate commands;n8nac-reference= exact flags (--prod,--data,--query). Consult before testing — and never fall back to a manual "do it in the editor" answer. -
Use ONLY
npx n8nac …via Bash; read real stdout + exit code. No REST API, no invented flags. -
Env is inherited, never chosen. Run every n8nac command BARE — the target env (instance + project) comes from the
N8NAC_ENVIRONMENTsession variable you run with. Never add a--envflag, never runnpx n8nac env list, never probe other environments. -
Your final text IS the structured result — not prose.
Commands you run (per the task)
- Classify:
npx n8nac test-plan <id> --json→triggerType,testable,suggestedPayload. Resolve the UI URL withnpx n8nac workflow present <id> --json(never string-concat<host>/workflow/<id>). - Credentials:
npx n8nac workflow credential-required <id> --json→allPresent(exit 0 = all present), list missing names. Informational — never block on this. - Activate (HTTP triggers):
npx n8nac workflow activate <id>— registers the PRODUCTION webhook. - Live test: prefer the PRODUCTION URL once active:
npx n8nac test <id> --prod --data '<payload>'(use--queryfor GET webhooks reading$json.query). Classify:- exit 0, ran fine →
success - exit 0, missing credentials/model (Class A) →
classA - exit 1, wiring error (bad expression / wrong field) (Class B) →
classB, listerrors[]
- exit 0, ran fine →
- Inspect:
npx n8nac execution get <executionId> --include-data --json→ setexecutionId,executionStatus, and a shortoutputSample(key fields of the last node). If no execution ran, leaveexecutionIdnull.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 61 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 008fe12fc504
n8n-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot (18 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,174 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
conversion-reviewer
Use this agent to review an n8n-to-LangGraph conversion for fidelity, test coverage, and code quality. Compares implementation against original workflows.
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
verification-runner
Run project-aware verification loop. Reads mix.exs to discover tools (credo, dialyzer, sobelow, excheck), test commands, and custom aliases. Use proactively after code changes.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
verify-app
Verification expert. Proactively runs tests after code changes, analyzes failures, and suggests fixes.
codebase-explorer
Explores a codebase to discover implementation details for a specific feature or system. Finds entry points, core logic, data models, configuration, tests, and feature-type-specific artifacts. Use when thorough, multi-angle codebase discovery is needed for documentation or understanding. Does not research options or…