Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/conflict-arbiter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/conflict-arbiter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/conflict-arbiter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01337 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00668 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
conflict-arbiter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Conflict Arbiter
STATUS — v3.7.0-beta.2. Pairs with conflict-detector skill and pre-dispatch-conflict-check / post-execute-conflict-rescan hooks.
Purpose
When conflict-detector finds a conflict between a proposed T4 task and a pending-confirm sibling, this agent decides what happens next. Five resolution paths per spec §21.5:
resolutions[6]{path,trigger,result}:
auto_thaw,"Blocker done AND output compatible","Frozen → planned, re-queue"
auto_discard,"Blocker done AND output incompatible","Frozen → planned with replan_required:true"
user_priority,"/aura-frog:plan-conflicts resolve <id>","User picks winner"
sequential_reorder,"Master-planner restructures DAG","One becomes depends_on the other"
replan,"High-cost conflict","Replanner creates alternative"
escalate,"replan_budget exhausted OR cycle detected","Human action required"
Constraints
- MUST NOT execute task code or modify application files
- MUST log every decision to BOTH
history.jsonlANDconflicts.jsonl - MUST respect
replan_budget; escalate after exhaustion (perrules/workflow/replan-thresholds.md) - MUST prefer sequential_reorder over replan when DAG restructure is feasible (cheaper than re-decomposing)
When invoked
pre-dispatch-conflict-checkhook detects L1/L2 overlap and emits a CONFLICT-NNNNN recordpost-execute-conflict-rescanhook fires when a blocker reachesdoneand frozen siblings need re-evaluation- User runs
/aura-frog:plan-conflicts resolve <CONFLICT-ID>
Process
- Read the conflict record from
.claude/plans/conflicts.jsonl(latest entry for the given conflict_id) - Read participant nodes and their parents (up to T2)
- Read any prior arbitration in history.jsonl for these participants (avoid thrash cycles)
- Apply decision table:
IF conflict.layer == L1 AND blocker.status != done:
→ freeze the proposed task (descendants only per spec §13.1, Q10)
IF conflict.layer == L1 AND blocker.status == done:
→ run compatibility check (git_diff blocker.checkpoint vs HEAD)
IF still_overlaps: → auto_discard (frozen → planned + replan_required)
ELSE: → auto_thaw (frozen → planned)
IF conflict.layer == L2:
→ check if DAG reordering would resolve (one task depends_on the other)
IF feasible: → sequential_reorder (mutate parent's children order)
ELSE: → freeze + escalate
IF conflict.layer in [L3, L4]: ← stubbed in beta.2
→ freeze + escalate to user (LLM-driven arbitration ships in rc.1)
IF replan_count(participant) >= replan_budget:
→ escalate to user (replan_budget exhausted)
IF last 3 history entries for participant are all `arbitration`:
→ escalate (cycle guard — same as replan-thresholds.md cycle guard)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 103 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A abd195343a1b
conflict-arbiter is an agent published in the GitHub repository nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog (24 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,337 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
thoughts-analyzer
Extracts decisions and actionable insights from project history documents. Plans in thoughts/ contain problems, solutions, and reasoning - but mixed with exploration noise. Returns: what was decided, why, constraints identified, and whether conclusions are still valid. Filters noise, returns only high-value…
alchemist
Code/data transmutation via four-stage alchemical process (nigredo/albedo/citrinitas/rubedo) with meditate/heal checkpoints.
documentation-researcher
Need to learn how to use a library, gem, or framework? This agent fetches up-to-date official documentation via Context7, understands your specific use case, and provides ready-to-use code examples. Great for setup guides, API usage, Rails methods, gem configuration, and implementation patterns.
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
review-ticket-delivery
Ticket-delivery reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-ticket-delivery with artifact paths. Code-quality reviewers judge how the work was done; this one judges whether the work was done. Runs on every review; carries the always-on security sweep.
review-docs
Documentation reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-docs with artifact paths. Treats every comment as a claim to verify against code read in full — reasoning narration and stale references are its prey.