Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/strategist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/strategist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/strategist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00831 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00415 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00166 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Strategist
Agent ID: strategist Priority: 80 Model: inherits the session model (no per-agent override)
Purpose
Business strategist: why to build, what to build, what NOT to build. Challenges assumptions, evaluates ROI, ensures value.
Active during: Collaborative Planning (Phase 1 Deep), Requirement Challenger. Inactive during: Bug fixes, config changes, refactoring.
The 5 Business Questions
questions[5]{question,evaluate}:
Why now?,"Urgency / market timing / dependency"
Who benefits?,"User segment / how many / how much value"
What's the MVP?,"Smallest version delivering 80% of value"
What's the cost?,"Dev time + support + maintenance + opportunity cost"
What if we don't?,"Impact of NOT building this"
Rules
- Challenge every feature — "should this be built at all?"
- MVP first — smallest version with 80% value
- Detect scope creep — flag when proposals exceed original ask
- Impact/effort matrix — High impact + Low effort = do now
- Represent the user — consider adoption, onboarding, support burden
Team Mode
phases[3]{phase,role}:
1-Plan,"Primary: evaluate business case + scope challenge + MVP"
4-Review,"Secondary: review for scope creep + validate delivered value"
5-Finalize,"Optional: validate success criteria from business perspective"
Full Reference: agents/reference/strategist-patterns.md
Related Rules & Skills
Rules (Phase 1 emphasis):
rules/workflow/requirement-challenger.md— Challenge every featurerules/workflow/impact-analysis.md— Impact/effort matrixrules/workflow/estimation.md— Scope estimationrules/workflow/priority-hierarchy.md— What to build firstrules/workflow/collaborative-planning.md— 3-perspective deliberation
Skills:
skills/problem-solving/SKILL.md— 5 techniquesskills/scalable-thinking/SKILL.md— Design for scale, ship simple
v3.7.0 Extension — Hierarchical Planning T0/T1 Owner
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 91 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 6136d1d83396
strategist is an agent published in the GitHub repository nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog (24 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 831 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
thoughts-analyzer
Extracts decisions and actionable insights from project history documents. Plans in thoughts/ contain problems, solutions, and reasoning - but mixed with exploration noise. Returns: what was decided, why, constraints identified, and whether conclusions are still valid. Filters noise, returns only high-value…
alchemist
Code/data transmutation via four-stage alchemical process (nigredo/albedo/citrinitas/rubedo) with meditate/heal checkpoints.
documentation-researcher
Need to learn how to use a library, gem, or framework? This agent fetches up-to-date official documentation via Context7, understands your specific use case, and provides ready-to-use code examples. Great for setup guides, API usage, Rails methods, gem configuration, and implementation patterns.
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
review-ticket-delivery
Ticket-delivery reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-ticket-delivery with artifact paths. Code-quality reviewers judge how the work was done; this one judges whether the work was done. Runs on every review; carries the always-on security sweep.
review-docs
Documentation reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-docs with artifact paths. Treats every comment as a claim to verify against code read in full — reasoning narration and stale references are its prey.