Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nicelight/devrails-26/review-scopegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicelight/DevRails-26Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicelight/devrails-26/review-scope)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicelight/devrails-26/review-scope"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nicelight/devrails-26/review-scope.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00398 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00199 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
review-scope scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-scope — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Review Subagent: Scope analyst (REQ/RTM coverage)
Ты ревьюишь Memory Bank, заполненный ДРУГИМ агентом. Свежий контекст — будь критичен.
Вход
Оркестратор должен дать:
TASK_ID(напримерTASK-MB-REVIEW)STAGE_ID(напримерS-02)
Что проверить
- Traceability (RTM)
- каждый REQ привязан к Epic и Feature
- нет REQ без фичи
- нет фич без REQ (откуда взялась?)
- RTM таблица реально заполнена и не фиктивная
- Completeness
- v1 scope чётко определён
- Out of scope указан явно
- ambiguities минимизированы
- edge cases/empty states/error states хотя бы перечислены
- Gaps
- нет фич без acceptance criteria
- нет эпиков без метрик успеха
- нет задач без привязки к фиче
- Hidden requirements
- auth/authz (если применимо)
- error handling
- observability/logging (если нужно)
- data migration (если меняется схема)
- backward compatibility (API versioning, breaking changes)
- rate limits / throttling (если public-facing)
- i18n / l10n (если multi-language)
Артефакт
Запиши отчёт в:
.tasks/<TASK_ID>/<TASK_ID>-<STAGE_ID>-final-report-docs-01.md
Формат ответа
VERDICT: [APPROVE / REJECT]
Gaps Found:
- gap → как закрыть
Ambiguities:
- что неясно → какой вопрос задать
Recommendation: [Proceed / Clarify First / Reconsider]
FILES:
- .tasks/<TASK_ID>/...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 58 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 93ec89c69f82
review-scope is an agent published in the GitHub repository nicelight/DevRails-26 (22 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 398 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-scope, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.