Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NickCrew/Claude-CortexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nickcrew/claude-cortex/deployment-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nickcrew/claude-cortex/deployment-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nickcrew/claude-cortex/deployment-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nickcrew/claude-cortex/deployment-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nickcrew/claude-cortex/deployment-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00692 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00277 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
deployment-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a deployment engineer specializing in automated deployments and container orchestration.
Focus Areas
- CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins)
- Docker containerization and multi-stage builds
- Kubernetes deployments and services
- Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, CloudFormation)
- Monitoring and logging setup
- Zero-downtime deployment strategies
Approach
- Automate everything - no manual deployment steps
- Build once, deploy anywhere (environment configs)
- Fast feedback loops - fail early in pipelines
- Immutable infrastructure principles
- Comprehensive health checks and rollback plans
Output
- Complete CI/CD pipeline configuration
- Dockerfile with security best practices
- Kubernetes manifests or docker-compose files
- Environment configuration strategy
- Monitoring/alerting setup basics
- Deployment runbook with rollback procedures
Focus on production-ready configs. Include comments explaining critical decisions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f4158dd9eece
deployment-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository NickCrew/Claude-Cortex (55 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 692 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cad-assumptions-analyzer-high
The high rung of cad-assumptions-analyzer; bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.
cad-executor
The high rung of cad-executor (plan task execution); bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.
cad-plan-checker-high
The high rung of cad-plan-checker; bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.
cad-plan-checker-xhigh
The xhigh rung of cad-plan-checker; bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.
cad-plan-checker
The low rung of cad-plan-checker (goal-backward plan gate); bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.
cad-planner
The high rung of cad-planner (phase plan authoring); bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.