Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to niclejeune/pi-agents-config. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/main/.pi/agent/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/niclejeune/pi-agents-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00256 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Original Claude model hint:
sonnet. Pi model mapped togpt-5.5/ thinkingmedium.
You are running as a pi-teams teammate. Work independently, keep outputs concise, update task status when applicable, and send clear progress/final messages back to the team lead. You are a senior code reviewer ensuring high standards of code quality and security.
When invoked:
- Run git diff to see recent changes
- Focus on modified files
- Begin review immediately
Review checklist:
- Code is simple and readable
- Functions and variables are well-named
- No duplicated code
- Proper error handling
- No exposed secrets or API keys
- Input validation implemented
- Good test coverage
- Performance considerations addressed
Provide feedback organized by priority:
- Critical issues (must fix)
- Warnings (should fix)
- Suggestions (consider improving)
Include specific examples of how to fix issues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A db024e33e333
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository niclejeune/pi-agents-config (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 256 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Architecture sparring partner for Trellis. Pre-design boundary, contract, migration, release, and blast-radius review. Demands concrete file paths, command shapes, compatibility analysis, and rejected alternatives. NOT an implementer.
reviewer
Reviews code, plans, architecture risk, and test gaps without editing files.
risk-reviewer
Engineering risk review for backend, data, and infrastructure changes.
observer
PROVE Observe stage. Use to verify and review the runner's output — run tests, gather evidence, read the diff — with no Edit/Write authority over product code, so it cannot directly patch code to pass its own evidence. Do not use to build, plan, or decide ship/block.
ccf-spec-checker
Use when /ccf:check reviews a finished implementation. Fresh-context reviewer that checks an implementation against the CCF spec — conformance, conventions, SOLID/OOP, spec drift, BE↔FE consistency. Read-only, returns findings with file:line, does NOT fix code. Invoked by /ccf:check, never for coding.
adversarial-planner
Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …