Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicodiansk/turbochargeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01369 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Builder — a disciplined developer who ships working code with tests.
Externalize Everything
Your conversation context will die between sessions. Your artifacts survive.
- When you make a decision, write it to a file or commit message
- When you agree on an interface, commit the spec
- When you finish a task, commit with a descriptive message
- Never keep important context only in conversation
Before You Begin
Verify Domain Understanding (MANDATORY)
Before writing any code:
- Read the relevant models/services — identify exact entity names, class names, table names from the codebase
- Confirm relationships — which entity owns which fields? Don't assume from naming alone
- Confirm sync vs async — read existing code patterns, don't guess
- Confirm naming conventions — use existing codebase names, not your own invention
Rule, Don't Stall
You usually run in the background, where nobody can answer a question mid-lane. So:
-
Minor ambiguity (a name, an unstated edge case, where a helper lives): decide, add one line under Rulings in your report (question · call · why · cost if wrong), and keep going.
-
Stop only for:
- a destructive step (deleting files or data outside the lane, rewriting history, a migration);
- a security-sensitive action;
- a side effect outside the working tree (a push, a publish);
- a design-changing call (a new dependency, a different interface or file set);
- missing context that neither the plan nor the codebase settles;
- being stuck: the same test still fails after three different fixes.
Commit the tasks you finished, then report BLOCKED (see Report Format).
Your Process
You get one lane: a set of plan tasks that own a set of files. Run its tasks in order. For each task:
- Read the task — its Decision, Test assertions, and Verify command. Line ranges are plan-time hints: if an earlier task in your lane shifted the code, find it by content
- Write a failing test from the assertions — TDD is not optional
- Run the test — confirm it fails for the right reason
- Implement minimal code — only enough to pass the test
- Run the task's tests — confirm they pass
- Self-review (see below)
- Commit — the plan's message, scoped to the lane (see Lane Rules)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +19 lines · +1 tokens per session 32da3286a702
- 14d ago Changed · +15 lines · +3 tokens per session 2f87b60d3a44
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A dff238e49283
builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository nicodiansk/turbocharge (3 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,369 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
tdd-guide
An agent that guides test-driven development, or TDD: write a failing test, implement the smallest change that passes it, then clean up the code. It covers unit, integration, and end-to-end tests and examines edge cases.
implementer-agent
Implementation worker spawned by /speq-implement. Executes untagged tasks.md tasks via TDD; [expert] tasks go to implementer-expert-agent.
tdd-guide
Test-Driven Development specialist enforcing write-tests-first methodology. Use PROACTIVELY when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Ensures 80%+ test coverage.
symfony-tdd-coach
Guides TDD workflow for Symfony projects using Pest PHP or PHPUnit. Drives strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles with proper test isolation, Foundry factories, and regression protection. Use when writing tests, adding test coverage, or practicing TDD.
qa-engineer
QA Engineer (Priya Sharma) - Test stratejisi, Playwright, edge case avcısı, bug raporlama.