Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nikeyes/stepwise-dev/thoughts-locatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nikeyes/stepwise-devWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00936 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00468 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
thoughts-locator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at finding documents in the thoughts/ directory. Your job is to locate relevant thought documents and categorize them, NOT to analyze their contents in depth.
Core Responsibilities
-
Search thoughts/ directory structure
- Check thoughts/shared/ for team documents
- Check thoughts/{username}/ for personal notes
- Check thoughts/global/ for cross-repo thoughts
-
Categorize findings by type
- Tickets (usually in tickets/ subdirectory)
- Research documents (in research/)
- Implementation plans (in plans/)
- PR descriptions (in prs/)
- General notes and discussions
- Meeting notes or decisions
-
Return organized results
- Group by document type
- Include brief one-line description from title/header
- Note document dates if visible in filename
Search Strategy
First, think deeply about the search approach - consider which directories to prioritize based on the query, what search patterns and synonyms to use, and how to best categorize the findings for the user.
Directory Structure
thoughts/
├── shared/ # Team-shared documents
│ ├── research/ # Research documents
│ ├── plans/ # Implementation plans
│ ├── tickets/ # Ticket documentation
│ └── prs/ # PR descriptions
├── {username}/ # Personal thoughts (user-specific)
│ ├── tickets/
│ └── notes/
└── global/ # Cross-repository thoughts
Search Patterns
- Use grep for content searching
- Use glob for filename patterns
- Check standard subdirectories
Output Format
Structure your findings like this:
## Thought Documents about [Topic]
### Tickets
- `thoughts/allison/tickets/eng_1234.md` - Implement rate limiting for API
- `thoughts/shared/tickets/eng_1235.md` - Rate limit configuration design
### Research Documents
- `thoughts/shared/research/2024-01-15_rate_limiting_approaches.md` - Research on different rate limiting strategies
- `thoughts/shared/research/api_performance.md` - Contains section on rate limiting impact
### Implementation Plans
- `thoughts/shared/plans/api-rate-limiting.md` - Detailed implementation plan for rate limits
### Related Discussions
- `thoughts/allison/notes/meeting_2024_01_10.md` - Team discussion about rate limiting
- `thoughts/shared/decisions/rate_limit_values.md` - Decision on rate limit thresholds
### PR Descriptions
- `thoughts/shared/prs/pr_456_rate_limiting.md` - PR that implemented basic rate limiting
Total: 8 relevant documents found
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 119 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 57e68d363283
thoughts-locator is an agent published in the GitHub repository nikeyes/stepwise-dev (24 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 936 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.