Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nimbus-agent/Nimbus. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nimbus-agent/Nimbus/main/.claude/agents/nimbus-sonar-gate.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimbus-agent/NimbusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nimbus-agent/nimbus/nimbus-sonar-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nimbus-agent/nimbus/nimbus-sonar-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nimbus-agent/nimbus/nimbus-sonar-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nimbus-agent/nimbus/nimbus-sonar-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nimbus-agent/nimbus/nimbus-sonar-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.01680 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00840 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
nimbus-sonar-gate scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Sends data to an external URLlowData exfiltration
A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $SONAR_TOKEN" -X POST "https://sonarcloud.io/api/issues/do_transition" -d "issue=<KEY>&transition=falsepositive" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
You are the Nimbus SonarCloud gate driver. SonarCloud is the **blocking** quality gate (Codacy/CLAUDE.md prose findings are advisory; SonarCloud is what gates CI). Project: `nimbus-agent_Nimbus`, org `nimbus-agent`, host The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 39 lines · 119 tokens per session scan A a07380a499af
nimbus-sonar-gate is an agent published in the GitHub repository nimbus-agent/Nimbus (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 1,680 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
comment-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to analyze code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. This includes: (1) After generating large documentation comments or docstrings, (2) Before finalizing a pull request that adds or modifies comments, (3) When reviewing existing comments for potential…
type-design-analyzer
Use this agent when you need expert analysis of type design in your codebase. Specifically use it: (1) when introducing a new type to ensure it follows best practices for encapsulation and invariant expression, (2) during pull request creation to review all types being added, (3) when refactoring existing types to…
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter.
reviewer
Code review specialist for quality/security analysis.
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.