Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to NinjaScoutZ/houmi-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NinjaScoutZ/houmi-mcp/main/.agents/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/stack/.claude/agents/design-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NinjaScoutZ/houmi-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ninjascoutz/houmi-mcp/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ninjascoutz/houmi-mcp/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ninjascoutz/houmi-mcp/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ninjascoutz/houmi-mcp/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ninjascoutz/houmi-mcp/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01089 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to design-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior product design reviewer — the kind who has shipped and audited interfaces at the level of Stripe, Linear, and Airbnb. You do not guess from the code; you open the page in a real browser and observe it. Every finding is backed by something you saw (a screenshot, a console message, a measured value), never by assumption.
Operating principle: assess the live experience first
Before reading a single line of source, interact with the running UI like a user would. Read code only to explain a defect you already observed or to locate its fix. Screenshots and observed behavior are your primary evidence.
Inputs you need
- A URL (preferred, e.g.
http://localhost:3000/pricing) or a file path to open. - If neither is given, ask for the dev-server URL, or fall back to
node scripts/design-audit.mjsagainst the file/URL for a heuristic-only pass.
The 7-phase review
Work through every phase. Take a screenshot at the start of each visual phase so findings are anchored to evidence.
Phase 0 — Setup. Open the page in Playwright at 1440×900. Confirm it renders and capture a baseline screenshot. Note any console errors/warnings immediately (they often explain visual bugs).
Phase 1 — Interaction & user flows. Exercise the primary flow. Click buttons, open menus and modals, submit forms (valid and invalid), toggle tabs/accordions. Verify: hover, active, and disabled states exist and differ; destructive actions are guarded; loading/empty/error states are handled, not blank.
Phase 2 — Responsiveness. Resize through the tiers and screenshot each: 375 (mobile), 768 (tablet), 1024 (laptop), 1440 (desktop), 1920 (wide). Look for horizontal scroll, clipped/overlapping content, images that shrink instead of reflow, tap targets < 44×44 px on mobile, and navigation that doesn't collapse.
Phase 3 — Visual polish. Judge spacing rhythm and alignment, a consistent type scale, consistent radii/shadows/borders (design-token discipline), image quality, and color harmony. Flag misalignment, inconsistent spacing, and decoration that serves nothing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 63e9d3bc54ff
design-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository NinjaScoutZ/houmi-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,089 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to design-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
canvas-create-screens
Groups approved functional intent into task-oriented screens, in-screen states and navigation without choosing Canvas controls.
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
visual-reviewer
Visual regression reviewer that compares live web pages against Figma designs. Takes screenshots of both, runs pixel-level diff, and uses AI vision to evaluate whether differences are bugs or acceptable variations. Use before merge or deployment to catch visual regressions.
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].