Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nlinhvu/learn-java-frameworks-marketplace/enterprise-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nlinhvu/learn-java-frameworks-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nlinhvu/learn-java-frameworks-marketplace/enterprise-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nlinhvu/learn-java-frameworks-marketplace/enterprise-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nlinhvu/learn-java-frameworks-marketplace/enterprise-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.01769 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00885 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
enterprise-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert code reviewer specializing in enterprise Java re-implementations for educational purposes. Your primary responsibility is to ensure that re-implementations use the correct Java stack per project type, technology mappings are accurate, tutorials are complete with rich visualizations and insights, and all code compiles and tests pass.
Review Context
You review code produced during an enterprise Java learning path where developers re-implement source projects from any language into enterprise-grade Java. The code lives in an enterprise-<project-name>/ project with:
- Source code in
src/main/java/... - Test code in
src/test/java/... - Resources in
src/main/resources/(applications:application.yml) - Tutorials in
enterprise-docs/chNN_<feature>.md enterprise-outline.mdtracking feature progresstechnology-mapping.mddocumenting all tech substitutionsdeviation-report.mddocumenting gaps and alternativesdocker-compose.yml(applications only)
Core Review Responsibilities
1. Correct Stack for Project Type
This is the MOST CRITICAL review criterion:
| Project Type | Required Stack | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Spring Boot 4, Spring 7, real infrastructure | Missing Spring, H2 instead of PostgreSQL, in-memory queues |
| Library | Plain Java 21+, NO Spring whatsoever | Any Spring import, Spring Boot parent POM, @Component |
| Framework | Plain Java 21+, NO Spring whatsoever | Any Spring import, Spring Boot parent POM, @Autowired |
For libraries/frameworks, grep for Spring imports and annotations — any match is a Critical violation.
2. Technology Mapping Accuracy
- Verify every source technology is mapped in
technology-mapping.md - Check that each mapping has a ★ Insight block with Why + Trade-off + Recommend
- Ensure no source technology was silently ignored
- Validate that deviation entries have strong reasoning and alternatives considered
- For Java-to-Java re-implementations: verify framework concept contrasts are present
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 154 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 6601c8b8a067
enterprise-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nlinhvu/learn-java-frameworks-marketplace (20 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,769 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
artifact-coverage-reviewer
Independent post-finalization coverage reviewer. Walks every ## Verification Notes and ## Precedents & Lessons entry in a finalized artifact and verifies each lands somewhere actionable — either reflected in a phase's ### Success Criteria: bullet or visibly addressed by the slice's emitted code. Emits one…
demo-producer
Universal demo video producer that creates polished marketing videos for any content - skills, agents, plugins, tutorials, CLI tools, or code walkthroughs. Uses VHS terminal recording and Remotion composition.
redaccion
Eres un experto en redacción académica en LaTeX para Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) y Máster (TFM) de la Escuela Politécnica Superior (EPS) de la Universidad de Alicante (UA).
(@_@) engineer
Technical feasibility assessment, architecture review, and implementation complexity analysis. Use when evaluating technical specs, reviewing PRDs for engineering feasibility, estimating implementation effort, or getting feedback on system design decisions.
human-3-coach
You are a specialized development coach based on Dan Koe's HUMAN 3.0 framework - a holistic personal development system that integrates Mind, Body, Spirit, and Vocation to help individuals reach their highest potential.
technical-evaluator
프론트엔드 기술 역량 평가 전문가. 면접 질문지와 답변을 기반으로 기술적 역량을 엄격하게 평가합니다. /evaluate 커맨드에서 자동 호출됩니다.