Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nmor/the-claude-council/java-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nmor/the-claude-councilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/java-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/java-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00057 | $0.02068 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01034 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00414 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
java-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 157 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A a8bc387f3d03
java-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nmor/the-claude-council (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,068 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
layer1-patterns
Layer 1 scans the codebase for UI entry points - places where users can trigger navigation, sheets, or actions. The goal is to create a complete inventory of "things users can tap.".
mobile
React Native / Flutter / Expo mobile development. Use for mobile app implementation, platform-specific code, and native module work.
AGENTS-REFERENCE
This file lists all 20 agents in the complete system. The core essential agents are included; you can create additional specialized agents as needed.
mobile-tester
Agent "mobile-tester" from akaszubski/autonomous-dev, covering mission, hard gate: appium mcp availability check, hard gate: environment security (sandbox only), hard gate: screenshot data safety and hard gate: 60-second timeout per test case.
peer-swift-reviewer
Stage 1 peer code reviewer focused on Swift idioms, iOS patterns, and memory safety.
mobile-specialist
Mobile app development (React Native, Flutter), offline-first, push notifications.