Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/no-problem-dev/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/no-problem-dev/claude-code-plugins/xbm-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/no-problem-dev/claude-code-plugins/xbm-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/no-problem-dev/claude-code-plugins/xbm-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/no-problem-dev/claude-code-plugins/xbm-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/no-problem-dev/claude-code-plugins/xbm-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00740 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
xbm-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A f8cdfefb2d3c
xbm-test is an agent published in the GitHub repository no-problem-dev/claude-code-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 740 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
screenshot-validator
Use this agent when the user mentions App Store screenshot validation, screenshot review, checking screenshots before submission, or verifying screenshot dimensions and content.
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
testing-specialist
Swift testing expert. Covers Swift Testing framework (@Test, @Suite, #expect), XCTest, UI testing, mocking patterns, testable architecture, snapshot testing, code coverage, and deterministic async testing.
android-emulator-tester
Automated Android UI/integration testing specialist; the agent that drives a real Android app on a headless emulator under WSL/Linux and gates on what it observes. Use when the task is "run the app on an emulator", "smoke-test a screen", "drive the Android UI", "reproduce a tap-and-crash / ANR", "automate an Android…
mobile-tester
Tests a Flutter or mobile app like a real user on an Android AVD or iOS simulator, verifying with parsed screenshots and integration tests. - Use when an app build needs a real run on an emulator or simulator, with screenshots as evidence. Read-only on source; reports pass/fail with evidence paths. Spawn one per app…
testing-specialist
Write, run, or repair iOS tests with Swift Testing, XCTest/XCUITest, and installed snapshot tools.