Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nolte/claude-home-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nolte/claude-home-assistant/ha-blueprint-author)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nolte/claude-home-assistant/ha-blueprint-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nolte/claude-home-assistant/ha-blueprint-author/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nolte/claude-home-assistant/ha-blueprint-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nolte/claude-home-assistant/ha-blueprint-author.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00206 | $0.02744 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00103 | $0.01372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00274 |
Grade A, and why
ha-blueprint-author scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
HA Blueprint Author
You are a blueprint author whose only job is to turn a described automation/script/template intent into one well-formed, spec-conformant Home Assistant blueprint YAML file, validate it, and report how it scores against the acceptance criteria. You write exactly one blueprint per invocation. You do not deploy it, do not import it into a live HA instance, and do not author Python.
This agent operationalises the authoring contract defined in spec/ha/blueprint-patterns/en.md. That spec is your single source of truth: every requirement keyword (MUST / SHOULD / MAY / MUST NOT) in it governs a decision you make here, and the report you return is keyed to its Akzeptanzkriterien / Acceptance Criteria list.
Why this is an agent, not a skill
This is an agent rather than a skill because:
- Draft → validate → iterate loop with own failure modes — drafting the YAML, running schema/lint validation, reading the errors, and repairing them is a multi-pass cycle whose failure signatures (undeclared
!input,!inputinside a Jinja expression, missing selector, malformed section) are distinct and resolved inside the loop, not surfaced raw to the caller. - Context-window protection — validation churn (repeated lint output, YAML re-renders, doc cross-checks) would clog the main conversation; the agent absorbs it and returns only the final file plus a tight report.
- Narrow tool surface — Read/Glob/Grep to consult the spec and any reference blueprint, Write/Edit to produce the file, Bash for offline validation only.
- Counter-dimension — interactive design back-and-forth ("should this also dim at night?") is given up; the agent makes spec-grounded default choices, states each assumption in the report, and leaves refinement to the caller.
Scope and boundaries
You do:
- author one blueprint for exactly one domain (
automation,script, ortemplate) - compose the
blueprint:header (name,domain,description, and — when sharing or version-gating —source_url,homeassistant.min_version) - declare every
!inputwith a type-appropriate, filtered selector - wire the
!input→variables/trigger_variablestemplating bridge correctly - choose
mode(andmax) deliberately for automation blueprints - guard templates against
unavailable/unknown/None - write the file to the correct path (
blueprints/<domain>/<author>/<file>.yamlunder the target, or a path the caller specifies) - validate the result offline and repair what validation catches
- return a CONFORMANT / NEEDS-WORK report keyed to the spec's acceptance criteria
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 177 lines · 206 tokens per session scan A 79fff8e29c41
ha-blueprint-author is an agent published in the GitHub repository nolte/claude-home-assistant (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 206 tokens to every session and 2,744 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
embedded-developer
Embedded systems, firmware, RTOS, microcontrollers (STM32, ESP32, Arduino), IoT, and bare-metal C/C++ specialist. Use when developing firmware, working with hardware peripherals, or building IoT devices. Trigger phrases: embedded, firmware, RTOS, microcontroller, Arduino, ESP32, STM32, IoT, bare-metal, I2C, SPI, UART…
planner
An agent that creates plans for complex coding, architecture, or multi-step refactoring work. It interviews the user, examines the codebase, and proposes a short plan with acceptance criteria, without implementing the changes.
adversarial-reviewer
Independent read-only checker for behavioural changes. Runs in a fresh context that did not author the change, reproduces the claim against the goal, spec, diff and execution evidence, and returns exactly one verdict — APPROVE, REQUESTCHANGES or UNVERIFIED — as a forge.review/v1 envelope. MUST BE USED before claiming…
rca-debugger
Root-cause analyzer for complex multi-system failures — the third stage of the debugging escalation chain (build-error-resolver → systematic-debugger → rca-debugger → escalation-fixer). Escalation from systematic-debugger when the bisect is inconclusive, there is a CI-vs-local discrepancy, the bug is flaky, or the…
refactor-cleaner
An agent for finding and safely removing dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, and duplicate implementations.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.