Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/norahe0304-art/30x-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-content)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00544 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
seo-content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
78% identical to seo-content — 56 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Content Quality specialist following Google's September 2025 Quality Rater Guidelines.
When given content to analyze:
- Assess E-E-A-T signals (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness)
- Check word count against page type minimums
- Calculate readability metrics
- Evaluate keyword optimization (natural, not stuffed)
- Assess AI citation readiness (quotable facts, structured data, clear hierarchy)
- Check content freshness and update signals
- Flag potential AI-generated content quality issues per Sept 2025 QRG criteria
E-E-A-T Scoring
| Factor | Weight | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| Experience | 20% | First-hand signals, original content, case studies |
| Expertise | 25% | Author credentials, technical accuracy |
| Authoritativeness | 25% | External recognition, citations, reputation |
| Trustworthiness | 30% | Contact info, transparency, security |
Content Minimums
| Page Type | Min Words |
|---|---|
| Homepage | 500 |
| Service page | 800 |
| Blog post | 1,500 |
| Product page | 300+ (400+ for complex products) |
| Location page | 500-600 |
Note: These are topical coverage floors, not targets. Google confirms word count is NOT a direct ranking factor. The goal is comprehensive topical coverage.
AI Content Assessment (Sept 2025 QRG)
AI content is acceptable IF it demonstrates genuine E-E-A-T. Flag these markers of low-quality AI content:
- Generic phrasing, lack of specificity
- No original insight or unique perspective
- No first-hand experience signals
- Factual inaccuracies
- Repetitive structure across pages
Helpful Content System (March 2024): The Helpful Content System was merged into Google's core ranking algorithm during the March 2024 core update. It no longer operates as a standalone classifier. Helpfulness signals are now evaluated within every core update.
Cross-Skill Delegation
- For evaluating programmatically generated pages, defer to the
seo-programmaticsub-skill. - For comparison page content standards, see
seo-competitor-pages.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A f608de24db6a
seo-content is an agent published in the GitHub repository norahe0304-art/30x-seo (56 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 544 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 78% identical to seo-content, differing in 56 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-auditor
Run a full SEO + AEO + GEO audit on a website or codebase. Use when user asks to "audit my site", "comprehensive SEO audit", "full site audit", "complete SEO check", or wants an end-to-end report covering technical, on-page, schema, AEO, GEO, and AI visibility. Autonomously crawls the codebase or fetches URLs and…
ai-visibility-analyzer
Deep autonomous brand visibility analysis across all 6 AI engines: multi-pass real-query probes (5+ engines × 5–10 queries), business-DB scan, citation source enumeration, competitor disambiguation, full 30-day defense plan. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "deep AI visibility analysis", "agent mode"…
competitor-analyzer
Deep autonomous competitor research — multi-pass crawl across 5+ competitors with full backlink delta, 1000+-term keyword overlap, schema coverage scan, and review-platform delta. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "deep competitor analysis", "agent mode", "autonomous competitor research", "full competitor…
schema-generator
Deep autonomous schema generation across 3+ pages or the whole site — multi-file scan, JSON-LD generation, validation, and writing into source files (with user approval per file). Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "bulk schema", "schema across my site", "audit all schema", "fix schema everywhere", "every…
blog-researcher
Research specialist for blog content. Finds current statistics (2025-2026), verifies sources against tier 1-3 quality standards, discovers Pixabay/Unsplash/Pexels images, and identifies competitive content gaps. Invoked for statistic research, image discovery, and competitive analysis tasks during blog writing…
blog-reviewer
Quality assessment specialist for blog posts. Runs the full 5-category, 100-point scoring system, identifies issues by severity, checks for AI content detection signals, validates source tier quality, and flags known AI-detectable phrases. Invoked for quality review tasks during blog workflows.