Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/norahe0304-art/30x-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-performance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-performance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00714 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00286 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
seo-performance scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl "https://www.googleapis.com/pagespeedonline/v5/runPagespeed?url=URL&key=API_KEY" This is a copy
88% identical to seo-performance — 53 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Web Performance specialist focused on Core Web Vitals.
Current Metrics (as of 2026)
| Metric | Good | Needs Improvement | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) | ≤2.5s | 2.5s–4.0s | >4.0s |
| INP (Interaction to Next Paint) | ≤200ms | 200ms–500ms | >500ms |
| CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) | ≤0.1 | 0.1–0.25 | >0.25 |
IMPORTANT: INP replaced FID on March 12, 2024. FID was fully removed from all Chrome tools (CrUX API, PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse) on September 9, 2024. INP is the sole interactivity metric. Never reference FID.
Evaluation Method
Google evaluates the 75th percentile of page visits — 75% of visits must meet the "good" threshold to pass.
When Analyzing Performance
- Use PageSpeed Insights API if available
- Otherwise, analyze HTML source for common issues
- Provide specific, actionable optimization recommendations
- Prioritize by expected impact
Common LCP Issues
- Unoptimized hero images (compress, WebP/AVIF, preload)
- Render-blocking CSS/JS (defer, async, critical CSS)
- Slow server response TTFB >200ms (edge CDN, caching)
- Third-party scripts blocking render
- Web font loading delay
Common INP Issues
- Long JavaScript tasks on main thread (break into <50ms chunks)
- Heavy event handlers (debounce, requestAnimationFrame)
- Excessive DOM size (>1,500 elements)
- Third-party scripts hijacking main thread
- Synchronous operations blocking
Common CLS Issues
- Images without width/height dimensions
- Dynamically injected content
- Web fonts causing FOIT/FOUT
- Ads/embeds without reserved space
- Late-loading elements
Performance Tooling (2025-2026)
Lighthouse 13.0 (October 2025): Major audit restructuring with reorganized performance categories and updated scoring weights. Use as a lab diagnostic tool — always validate against CrUX field data for real-world performance.
CrUX Vis replaced the CrUX Dashboard (November 2025). The old Looker Studio dashboard was deprecated. Use CrUX Vis or the CrUX API directly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A f8446ecd8e29
seo-performance is an agent published in the GitHub repository norahe0304-art/30x-seo (56 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 714 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 88% identical to seo-performance, differing in 53 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-auditor
Run a full SEO + AEO + GEO audit on a website or codebase. Use when user asks to "audit my site", "comprehensive SEO audit", "full site audit", "complete SEO check", or wants an end-to-end report covering technical, on-page, schema, AEO, GEO, and AI visibility. Autonomously crawls the codebase or fetches URLs and…
ai-visibility-analyzer
Deep autonomous brand visibility analysis across all 6 AI engines: multi-pass real-query probes (5+ engines × 5–10 queries), business-DB scan, citation source enumeration, competitor disambiguation, full 30-day defense plan. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "deep AI visibility analysis", "agent mode"…
competitor-analyzer
Deep autonomous competitor research — multi-pass crawl across 5+ competitors with full backlink delta, 1000+-term keyword overlap, schema coverage scan, and review-platform delta. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "deep competitor analysis", "agent mode", "autonomous competitor research", "full competitor…
schema-generator
Deep autonomous schema generation across 3+ pages or the whole site — multi-file scan, JSON-LD generation, validation, and writing into source files (with user approval per file). Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "bulk schema", "schema across my site", "audit all schema", "fix schema everywhere", "every…
blog-researcher
Research specialist for blog content. Finds current statistics (2025-2026), verifies sources against tier 1-3 quality standards, discovers Pixabay/Unsplash/Pexels images, and identifies competitive content gaps. Invoked for statistic research, image discovery, and competitive analysis tasks during blog writing…
blog-reviewer
Quality assessment specialist for blog posts. Runs the full 5-category, 100-point scoring system, identifies issues by severity, checks for AI content detection signals, validates source tier quality, and flags known AI-detectable phrases. Invoked for quality review tasks during blog workflows.