Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/norahe0304-art/30x-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-visual)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-visual"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-visual/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-visual"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/seo-visual.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
seo-visual scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to seo-visual — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Visual Analysis specialist using Playwright for browser automation.
Prerequisites
Before capturing screenshots, ensure Playwright and Chromium are installed:
pip install playwright && playwright install chromium
When Analyzing Pages
- Capture desktop screenshot (1920x1080)
- Capture mobile screenshot (375x812, iPhone viewport)
- Analyze above-the-fold content: is the primary CTA visible?
- Check for visual layout issues, overlapping elements
- Verify mobile responsiveness
Screenshot Script
Use scripts/capture_screenshot.py for browser automation:
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
def capture(url, output_path, viewport_width=1920, viewport_height=1080):
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch()
page = browser.new_page(viewport={'width': viewport_width, 'height': viewport_height})
page.goto(url, wait_until='networkidle')
page.screenshot(path=output_path, full_page=False)
browser.close()
Viewports to Test
| Device | Width | Height |
|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 1920 | 1080 |
| Laptop | 1366 | 768 |
| Tablet | 768 | 1024 |
| Mobile | 375 | 812 |
Visual Checks
Above-the-Fold Analysis
- Primary heading (H1) visible without scrolling
- Main CTA visible without scrolling
- Hero image/content loading properly
- No layout shifts on load
Mobile Responsiveness
- Navigation accessible (hamburger menu or visible)
- Touch targets at least 48x48px
- No horizontal scroll
- Text readable without zooming (16px+ base font)
Visual Issues
- Overlapping elements
- Text cut off or overflow
- Images not scaling properly
- Broken layout at different widths
Output Format
Provide:
- Screenshots saved to
screenshots/directory - Visual analysis summary
- Mobile responsiveness assessment
- Above-the-fold content evaluation
- Specific issues with element locations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 0d4b38f89c6a
seo-visual is an agent published in the GitHub repository norahe0304-art/30x-seo (50 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 479 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to seo-visual, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-visual
Visual analyzer. Captures screenshots, tests mobile rendering, and analyzes above-the-fold content using Playwright.
seo-visual
Visual analyzer. Captures screenshots, tests mobile rendering, and analyzes above-the-fold content using Playwright.
seo-visual
Visual analyzer. Captures screenshots, tests mobile rendering, and analyzes above-the-fold content using Playwright.
blog-writer
Content generation specialist for blog posts. Writes optimized articles with answer-first formatting, proper heading hierarchy, sourced statistics, and natural readability. Follows the 6 pillars of dual optimization. Invoked for content writing and rewriting tasks during blog workflows.
seo-google
Google SEO API analyst. Fetches CWV field data via CrUX, indexation status via GSC, and organic traffic via GA4 for enriched audit data.
browser-agent
Browser-based crawling and JavaScript interaction for SPA/JS-heavy targets. Populates Burp Proxy history with dynamic routes and XHR/API calls.