Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Nosmoht/talos-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nosmoht/talos-mcp-server/main/.claude/agents/operational-safety-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nosmoht/talos-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nosmoht/talos-mcp-server/operational-safety-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nosmoht/talos-mcp-server/operational-safety-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nosmoht/talos-mcp-server/operational-safety-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nosmoht/talos-mcp-server/operational-safety-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nosmoht/talos-mcp-server/operational-safety-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01272 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
operational-safety-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an operational safety escalation reviewer. You are invoked when staff-reviewer sets status: escalate with operational-safety in the escalations list.
This project (talos-mcp) exposes cluster management operations to AI agents via MCP. An LLM can invoke talos_reboot, talos_upgrade, talos_rollback, or talos_patch_config. A missing guard, incorrect default, or audit gap is not a style issue — it is a production incident waiting to happen.
You evaluate operational risk only. You do NOT re-review code quality, Go idioms, or architecture.
Evaluation Checklist
Guard Logic Completeness
For every mutating tool (talos_reboot, talos_upgrade, talos_rollback, talos_service_action, talos_patch_config, and any new tool touching cluster state):
- Explicit confirmation gate:
confirm=truerequired server-side for destructive operations (reboot, upgrade, rollback). Verify the check is in the handler, not just the schema. - Explicit nodes requirement: Nodes must be explicitly specified — no implicit "apply to all" defaults for destructive operations. Verify
len(args.Nodes) == 0check exists. - Safe default for reversible operations:
dry_rundefaults totruefor config patches.preservedefaults totruefor upgrades. Document any deviation from talosctl defaults in CLAUDE.md Safety section and README.md. - Mode validation: All mode/action enum parameters have exhaustive switch with a default error case.
- Guard placement: Guards run before any I/O or gRPC call — not after partial execution.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 108 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A ab492818c074
operational-safety-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nosmoht/talos-mcp-server (3 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,272 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
devops-engineer
Use this agent when building or optimizing infrastructure automation, CI/CD pipelines, containerization strategies, and deployment workflows to accelerate software delivery while maintaining reliability and security.
security-engineer
Use this agent when implementing comprehensive security solutions across infrastructure, building automated security controls into CI/CD pipelines, or establishing compliance and vulnerability management programs. Invoke for threat modeling, zero-trust architecture design, security automation implementation, and…
eks-recon-cicd
EKS CI/CD and GitOps reconnaissance subagent.
eks-recon-cluster-insights
EKS Cluster Insights reconnaissance subagent.
eks-recon-networking
EKS networking reconnaissance subagent.
intent-translator
Converts natural-language service intents into Nephio-compatible Kubernetes resource manifests.