Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nova-Violet-Role/RoT-MoEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-antivenom)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-antivenom"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-antivenom/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-antivenom"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-antivenom.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.03261 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01631 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00652 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00326 |
Grade A, and why
rot-antivenom scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 279 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A a4e65ec15658
rot-antivenom is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nova-Violet-Role/RoT-MoE (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 3,261 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
dossier-pass-b-falsification
Independent verification pass B — model falsification. Selects and executes end-to-end traces from the sources of truth (entry point through code path, data store, deployment, and observability) and attempts to break the documented project model, reporting every point where the package and the sources diverge. Use…
code-reviewer
Review code changes for quality, logic correctness, edge cases, security, and error handling. Return P1/P2/P3 findings using the canonical two-column finding table from references/finding-schema.md (Finding | Suggested Fix, with id/category/location packed into the Finding cell).
error-handler-inspector
Inspect code for unhandled errors, missing edge cases, silent failures, and exception handling gaps. Return P1/P2/P3 findings with file:line citations.
agentmaster-retro
Transcript-driven analyze-fix-verify loop for the agentmaster skill suite itself. Use after a pipeline run leaves artifacts behind — .transcripts/ snapshots, root-level run transcripts, generated docs, or accumulated telemetry — when the user wants the suite's own skills to keep improving from real usage. Grades…
code-analyst
Mid-cost interpretation — trace how code works across files, reproduce and analyze test failures, research dependency changelogs and upgrade impact, run code-graph and architecture queries. Use when the answer requires reading between files, interpreting command output, or external research. Also the escalation target…
debugger
Adversarial post-implement sweep agent. Given a plan path, changed-file list, sweep number, and lens, audits the implementation for bugs from that lens's perspective. Flag-only — never modifies code. Scope bounded to changed files + 2-hop dependencies. One finding per real issue; no style/naming/formatting feedback.