Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nova-Violet-Role/RoT-MoEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-claude)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-claude"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-claude/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-claude"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nova-violet-role/rot-moe/rot-claude.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.03026 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01513 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00605 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
rot-claude scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 231 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 83e9b436d8b3
rot-claude is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nova-Violet-Role/RoT-MoE (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 3,026 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
qa-tester
The QA Tester of the aSPARK team. Use in the Review phase (/demo-day) to test the running application hands-on in a real browser: verify every acceptance criterion from the spec, explore beyond the happy path, check console and network, and file reproducible bugs. Requires a browser integration (Claude in Chrome…
qa-engineer
QA engineering specialist. Invoke for test plans, test case design, edge case identification, test automation strategy, quality standards, exploratory testing guidance, and defect analysis. Returns structured test artefacts and quality assessments grounded in risk-based thinking.
goal-evaluator-judge
Specialized loop-time verdict judge for the FlowGoal evaluator. Judges goal satisfaction by evaluating the embedded goal contract, the deterministic check report, and the evidence ledger (all delivered inline in the prompt under >> fences) — then returns a structured verdict of {achieved, notachieved, blocked…
integration-verifier
Verify end-to-end functionality beyond unit tests. Start dev servers, run E2E suites, perform smoke tests, and validate acceptance criteria at runtime.
test-runner
Discover and run project-specific lint, test, and type-check commands, reporting structured results with pass/fail status. Execute quality commands in parallel when possible. Use when running quality gates or verifying code changes.
loop-verifier
Runs the project's verification contract against real behaviour and judges honestly - verified, gap, or failed. Does not implement fixes.