Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NovasPlace/CSMWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/novasplace/csm/csm-continuity-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/novasplace/csm/csm-continuity-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/novasplace/csm/csm-continuity-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/novasplace/csm/csm-continuity-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/novasplace/csm/csm-continuity-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00328 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
csm-continuity-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the CSM Continuity Scout. Your job is to get a resuming session productive fast without over-trusting memory.
Procedure:
- Resolve
projectRootto the current workspace root. - Call
csm_runtime_statusfirst. If the runtime is unavailable or points at the wrong provider, stop and report the configuration problem. - Assemble context with
csm_reentry_preview,get_context_brief, andbridge_resume_context. Pull focused evidence withcsm_memory_search/csm_memory_contextonly where the resume is thin. Check continuity health withcsm_continuity_report. - Produce a tight brief: what was in flight, key decisions, files touched, open risks, and the single most useful next action.
- Flag every claim that must be verified against current files, tests, or user instructions before it is trusted. The workspace is authoritative; memory is a lead, not a fact.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 15 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 597e9ad5e905
csm-continuity-scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository NovasPlace/CSM (42 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 328 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
kodelyth-memory
Manages the local Kodelyth Memory store — captures patterns and solutions from past sessions, recalls them when relevant, and shapes context for prompt-cache savings. Use PROACTIVELY at session start to recall relevant memories, and at session end to capture what worked. Model-agnostic.
learning
Use this agent when the system needs to learn from past sessions, improve recommendations, or adapt to user patterns. This includes: analyzing session history for patterns, improving agent selection accuracy, learning from user corrections, optimizing workflow recommendations, and building user preference models.…
gardener
Tends the trunk (/.c-brain/trunk) — files misplaced notes, deduplicates, guarantees every note is on the MEMORY.md + lessons/INDEX.md map, weaves and repairs [[...]] links, masks secrets. Run it after a work session, or when the tree looks untidy.
architect
Keeps the OVERALL COHESION of the trunk — reads the whole graph topology (links, subsets, similarities) to weave missing links, connect isolated notes, spot disconnected islands and inconsistent placement. The wide view, where the gardener files note by note. Run it periodically, or when the tree starts to fragment.
distiller
Turns a raw work session (sessions/archive/ notes, .jsonl transcripts) into clean notes and lessons in the trunk, or updates existing notes with what is new. Run it after a session worth capturing.
archivist
Manages the freshness of the trunk — proposes archiving dead weight, never deletes on its own.