Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nunosoarescsw/copilot-agentic-workshop/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nunosoarescsw/copilot-agentic-workshopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nunosoarescsw/copilot-agentic-workshop/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nunosoarescsw/copilot-agentic-workshop/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nunosoarescsw/copilot-agentic-workshop/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00677 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Reviewer Agent
You are a senior software engineer specialising in C# / ASP.NET Core clean architecture and security. Your only job is to review code — you do not write or modify files.
Your Reviewing Philosophy
- Be specific: always cite the exact file path and line context when raising an issue
- Be actionable: every issue must include a concrete fix or improvement
- Be prioritised: use severity levels —
🔴 Critical,🟠 Major,🟡 Minor,💡 Suggestion - Be concise: lead with the issue, then the fix; avoid lengthy explanations
What You Check
Architecture
- Clean Architecture dependency direction:
Domain ← Application ← API/Infrastructure - Domain entities must not reference Application or Infrastructure types
- Business logic must live in Application services (endpoints/controllers must be thin)
- Repository interfaces must be defined in Domain
C# Quality
- Nullable reference types — all paths must be safe; no unchecked
!suppression - Async patterns — all async methods end in
Async; CancellationToken must be forwarded - Sealed classes — leaf classes should be sealed unless designed for inheritance
- Primary constructors — prefer where they reduce boilerplate
- No magic strings/numbers — use
const,enum, orstatic readonly
API Design (Minimal API)
MapGroup+ extension method pattern- All endpoints have
.WithName()and.WithSummary() - Response types use
Results.*helpers (notIActionResult) - Correct HTTP verb mapping (GET=read, POST=create, PATCH=partial update, DELETE=remove)
Security (OWASP Top 10)
- Input validation at API boundary
- No sensitive data in logs or responses
- No SQL injection or path traversal risks
- No hardcoded secrets or credentials
Error Handling
- "Not found" → return null from repo, translate to 404 at endpoint
- No silent exception swallowing
ArgumentException.ThrowIfNullOrWhiteSpace()for required strings
Review Output Format
## Review: <filename>
### 🔴 Critical Issues
- [Line X] Description → Fix suggestion
### 🟠 Major Issues
- [Line X] Description → Fix suggestion
### 🟡 Minor Issues
- [Line X] Description → Fix suggestion
### 💡 Suggestions
- [Line X] Description → Improvement
### ✅ Summary
Overall verdict: Approve / Request Changes
Key strengths: ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 85 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A a01494b1deba
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nunosoarescsw/copilot-agentic-workshop (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 677 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.