Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/incident-commandergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nxtg-ai/forge-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/incident-commander)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/incident-commander"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/incident-commander.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01908 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00954 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00382 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
incident-commander scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Commander
The calm in the storm -- a crisis response specialist that brings Google SRE structure to chaos, classifies severity in seconds, and ensures every incident leaves the system stronger than before.
| Level | L1 Vibe Coder |
| Category | Engineering Leadership |
| Model | Opus |
What It Does
The Incident Commander takes command when things break. It follows the Google SRE Incident Response Framework -- structured roles, clear communication, blameless analysis, and relentless focus on reducing mean time to recovery (MTTR). When production is down and everyone is panicking, this agent provides the structure that turns chaos into coordinated response.
It classifies incidents into four severity levels (SEV1 through SEV4), each with specific response expectations, communication cadences, and escalation rules. It guides teams through four response phases: triage (first 5 minutes -- what is broken, who is affected, what changed), mitigation (minutes 5-30 -- stop the bleeding with rollback, feature flags, circuit breakers, or scaling), root cause analysis (5 Whys, Fishbone diagrams, timeline reconstruction), and resolution/verification (confirm the fix, verify metrics, update the status page).
Beyond active incident response, the Incident Commander handles proactive preparedness: dependency failure analysis (blast radius mapping), runbook generation for recurring issues, monitoring alert tuning (reducing noise, improving signal-to-noise ratio), and blameless post-incident review facilitation. The core principle: every incident makes the system stronger, or you are scheduling the next one.
When to Use It
- Active production incident: When APIs are returning 500s, error rates are spiking, deployments caused regressions, or users cannot access the product.
- Post-incident review: After an incident is resolved, to facilitate a blameless post-mortem with timeline reconstruction, root cause analysis, and action items.
- Dependency blast radius analysis: When you need to understand what breaks if a specific dependency (Redis, a third-party API, a database) goes down.
- Alert tuning: When alert fatigue is causing real issues to be missed -- hundreds of alerts per day with no clear signal.
- Runbook creation: When you need to document recovery procedures for recurring failure patterns so on-call engineers can respond faster.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 147 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c64502e32903
incident-commander is an agent published in the GitHub repository nxtg-ai/forge-plugin (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,908 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
agent-system
An AgentSystem composes multiple Agents into a directed graph that Orloj executes as a coordinated workflow. The graph defines how messages flow between agents during task execution.
board-workflow
This document describes the end-to-end workflow for AI-assisted issue resolution, from initial issue creation through merged PR.
claude-expression
DISCLAIMER: This document is managed exclusively by Claude Code. The repository admin (AndrewAltimit) does not manage this file and is not allowed to directly edit it. Any updates must come from Claude Code through collaborative sessions.
codebase-analysis-pipeline
This document describes a two-stage automated pipeline for continuous codebase improvement.
codex-setup
This guide covers the setup and usage of OpenAI Codex as an AI agent in the repository.
containerization-strategy
This document outlines the containerization approach for the multi-agent system, addressing both security concerns and architectural constraints while maintaining functionality.