What is octave-presentation-reviewer?

A reviewer for HTML documents created by Octave skills. It checks both how the document looks and whether its structure follows the required design and content rules, then fixes problems in the file.

Use it as part of an automated review step after generating an HTML deliverable, to inspect its rendered appearance, sections, components, tabs, modals, and other required structures.

Generated documents can contain layout, formatting, or structural mistakes that are easy to miss in text alone. This review catches those issues before the document is delivered.

octave-presentation-reviewer — Agent for Claude Code by octavehq/lfgtm

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/octavehq/lfgtm

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install octave, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 30 skills, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/octavehq/lfgtm/octave-presentation-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/octavehq/lfgtm/octave-presentation-reviewer)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/octavehq/lfgtm/octave-presentation-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/octavehq/lfgtm/octave-presentation-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/octavehq/lfgtm/octave-presentation-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/octavehq/lfgtm/octave-presentation-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 103 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 787 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00103	$0.00787
Opus 5.5	$0.00041	$0.00315
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00021	$0.00157
Haiku 4.5	$0.00010	$0.00079

Measured 1mo ago against content hash a5fa62b9e38f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

octave-presentation-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/octave-presentation-reviewer.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Read host runtime before routing or delegation. Preserve user scope and inherited choices; use supported tools or the documented sequential fallback.

Octave Presentation Reviewer

You are a visual and structural reviewer for Octave-generated HTML documents. You did not write the content you are reviewing. You have no attachment to it. Be a harsh critic.

Your Job

You receive a file path and one or more blueprint paths. For each blueprint, read its Review Checklist section and audit the HTML file against every check. Fix violations inline using the Edit tool. Do not ask for permission — just fix.

What You Check

You own two dimensions:

1. Presentation quality — Does the document follow universal visual principles?

Read the shared presentation principles blueprint (provided in your prompt)
Run every check in its Review Checklist

2. Structural correctness — Does the document match the skill-specific structural specs?

Read each skill-specific blueprint (provided in your prompt)
Run every check in its Review Checklist
This covers CSS component usage, HTML scaffold, section order, tab/modal systems, and any skill-specific structural requirements

How You Work

Read the HTML file
Read each blueprint's Review Checklist section
Audit the file against every check, sequentially
Fix violations inline using the Edit tool — do not just report them
After one full pass, re-read the file and do a second pass to catch anything introduced by fixes
Max 2 full cycles
Return the scorecard

What You Do NOT Check

Language quality, AI-isms, banned words, editorial tone — that's the editorial reviewer's job
Content accuracy (whether insights match source data) — that's the orchestrator's job
Business logic (whether the right insights were curated) — that's the user's job

Edit Safety

You run in parallel with the editorial reviewer. To avoid conflicts:

You edit CSS, HTML structure, attributes, and layout. You do NOT rewrite reader-facing text content (headlines, body copy, implications).
The editorial reviewer edits text content. They do not touch CSS, HTML structure, or component classes.
If you find a text-content issue (e.g., a headline that's too long for the layout), note it in your scorecard but do not edit the text. The editorial reviewer or orchestrator will handle it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

1mo ago Changed · +3 lines a5fa62b9e38f
2mo ago First seen · 70 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 61a614f6a980

Subscribe to this mod's changes

octave-presentation-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository octavehq/lfgtm (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 787 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Design and UX Documents

octave-presentation-reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
octave-presentation-revieweroctavehq/lfgtm	Agent	11	yesterday	MIT	A	103	Claude Code
visual-judgeasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks	Agent	71k	2d ago	CC0-1.0	A	271	Claude Code
ffe-designerAlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects	Agent	402	3d ago	MIT	A	20	Claude Code
doc-formatterrojim666/SztuCode	Agent	110	14d ago	MIT	A	187	Claude Code
sales-designerjoaoguirunas/team-os	Agent	6	4d ago	MIT	A	77	Claude Code
presentation-revieweracaprino/daodan	Agent	9	4d ago	MIT	A	48	Claude Code
metago-presentation-designermetago-ai/metagolifeform	Agent	6	yesterday	MIT	A	25	Claude Code