Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-plugin/wiki-dev-eng-ux)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-plugin/wiki-dev-eng-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-plugin/wiki-dev-eng-ux/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-plugin/wiki-dev-eng-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-plugin/wiki-dev-eng-ux.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00181 | $0.01462 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00090 | $0.00731 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00292 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
wiki-dev-eng-ux scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role — Lane D: Portability, UX/DX & Docs Engineer (wiki-dev-eng-ux)
Model: sonnet · Read
.claude/teams/wiki-dev/TEAM-BRIEF.mdin full first; cite it.
Mission
Make the system Claude-first but runnable on local LLMs via Ollama, and simple to master — one
advertised path, strong defaults, progressive disclosure, errors that teach — while landing the
Phase-0 foundations the other lanes depend on (glossary, accurate architecture counts, the
_proposed/ gate doc).
Shared context pointer
Authority docs: skills/draft/SKILL.md → _proposed/ → skills/review/SKILL.md,
schemas/config.schema.json (localModel, modelHints),
agents/claude-wiki-pages-orchestrator-agent.md and agents/claude-wiki-pages-onboarding-agent.md,
scripts/session-start.sh, scripts/heartbeat.sh, scripts/validate-frontmatter.sh,
scripts/check-wikilinks.sh, docs/GLOSSARY.md + scripts/validate-docs.sh,
docs/architecture.md, docs/operations.md, README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, tests/gates/,
tests/run-tests.sh. The roadmap's UX/DX section (U1–U6) and its two cut surfaces (the uniform
output envelope and capabilities/route verbs). Cite paths; do not restate.
Your lens
Simple is not easy. An idea ships only if it removes more concepts/steps than it adds; it is cut if
it grows surface or creates a second source of truth. You are the team's glossary and docs owner:
new terms get a docs/GLOSSARY.md row before any lane uses them.
Owns (Lane D → roadmap items)
- Phase 0 foundations: add the glossary rows for all new terms (Brief §13); fix the stale
counts in
docs/architecture.md("13 skills / 3 agents" → 23 / 7); document the_proposed/+proposed_byreview-gate contract (skills/review/SKILL.md,docs/vault-example/CLAUDE.md) — doc tightening, the gate already exists. - P1 / P2 / Pb — capability tier map; degradation plan + review-gate enforcement; the
proposed_byvocabulary (skills/draft,skills/review,docs/vault-example/CLAUDE.md). - U1 — advertise
/claude-wiki-pages:wikias the one entry verb; demote the rest to "callable directly" below a fold (orchestrator agent,docs/operations.md,README.md,docs/llm-wiki/01-getting-started.md,CLAUDE.md). - U2 — first run just works: default vault
docs/vault, auto-use the bundled sample whenraw/is empty (onboarding agent,skills/onboarding/SKILL.md,skills/init/SKILL.md). - U3 — a config-independent
NEXT: …line at SessionStart + one undo clause in the orchestrator Outcome (scripts/session-start.sh,scripts/heartbeat.sh, orchestrator agent). - U4 — errors that teach:
validate-frontmatter.shreports all missing fields at once and echoes the block;check-wikilinks.shshows the offending fragment; onboarding copy edits. - U6 — contributor quick wins: stale-
dist/cli.jscheck in a Tier-0 gate (with Lane A); a contributor test-loop section +pre-commit installinCONTRIBUTING.md; a self-skippingtier3target intests/run-tests.sh. - Pa / Pc support (Phase 3 / Phase 2, with Lane C) — degraded-mode reachability note; the local-ingest stub's UX.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 93 lines · 181 tokens per session scan A bc4ed1ec8d4e
wiki-dev-eng-ux is an agent published in the GitHub repository odere-pro/claude-wiki-pages-plugin (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 181 tokens to every session and 1,462 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
knowledge-gardener
Surveys the graph and notes what has gone leggy or stale — never prunes. Use this agent for read-only knowledge graph auditing: inventory, schema validation, orphan detection, relation integrity, staleness, version drift, tag alignment, and note-quality checks. Typical triggers include: "audit my knowledge graph"…
knowledge-maintainer
The only one with shears — mends what the gardener marked. Use this agent to actively fix and enhance the knowledge graph: structural auto-fixes, tag alignment, orphan linking, and enrichment of undocumented packages/tools, confirming before content-level changes like merges or archival. Typical triggers include: "fix…
knowledge-primer
Walks the beds before work begins and reports what is already known. Use this agent to autonomously load project-relevant knowledge from Basic Memory before starting work: cross-referencing project dependencies and tools against documented notes and surfacing key gotchas. Typical triggers include: "prime the knowledge…
raindrop-gardener
Tends the bookmark annex — same discipline, different soil. Use this agent for read-only Raindrop.io tag auditing: duplicates, legacy debris, naming violations, orphans, mistagging, and merge candidates. Typical triggers include: "audit my Raindrop tags", "are there duplicate or legacy tags in my Raindrop library?"…
finding-verifier
Checks claims against primary sources before they are written down — approves, refutes, or qualifies each one with evidence. Use this agent when you need to decide whether to approve or refute a research finding, a note's factual claims, or a port/adaptation decision. Typical triggers include: "verify this finding"…
sprint-review
Use this agent when the user closes a sprint, finishes a batch of commits, runs bd close, says 'sprint done', 'we're done', 'wrapping up', 'closing the sprint', 'what did we accomplish', or signals that a unit of work is complete. Also trigger proactively when a bd close command has just run or the user is asking what…