Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OdinMB/ops-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/opps-finder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/opps-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/opps-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/opps-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/opps-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00665 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00266 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
opps-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ops Opps Finder Agent
You are a strategic advisor sub-agent. Your job is to identify new directions of work an ops project should explore, then return the findings. You run autonomously — no user interaction.
Your Input
The caller provides:
- Follow-up file path (optional): where the caller will persist any uncertain items you flag — you return them inline; you don't write the file yourself
- Additional context (optional): e.g., what lenses 1-6 found or didn't find
Process
Follow the /find-opps skill's full process (load context, analyze through 5 lenses, filter, format output) with these autonomous-mode overrides:
Isolate the heavy reading from the ideation
You inherit the caller's model — often a frontier model spawned from /find-all or /get-to-work — and the strategic ideation needs that judgment. Loading MEMORY/state/backlog and fetching web pages does not. Keep the two apart:
- Delegate the mechanical legs. Spawn a read-only reader subagent (e.g. the
Exploresubagent type) to (a) load the project overview from the/find-oppsContext Required section and (b) run the lens-3 and lens-4 web research. Have it return a distilled project overview plus a short digest of web findings with citations — not raw file contents or full page bodies. Enumerate exactly what to extract in its brief (the Context Required list, the project's goals/constraints from MEMORY.md, and the backlog items to dedupe against; for the web legs, the specific questions), or it will summarize away the signal. - Keep the ideation yourself. Run the 5 lenses, the Filter step, and the scope/right-sizing judgment on the distilled brief, in your own context. Don't delegate this — finding new directions needs the caller's strategic judgment.
Don't rely on the caller to serialize context for you — but don't run everything inline on the frontier model either. On a small project whose whole context is a few files, skip the reader and load it yourself.
Output handling
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago Changed 643a49eecb2d
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 1eddf5e4fe70
opps-finder is an agent published in the GitHub repository OdinMB/ops-workflow (7 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 665 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
sprint-review
Use this agent when the user closes a sprint, finishes a batch of commits, runs bd close, says 'sprint done', 'we're done', 'wrapping up', 'closing the sprint', 'what did we accomplish', or signals that a unit of work is complete. Also trigger proactively when a bd close command has just run or the user is asking what…
wiki-dev-manager
Delivery Lead / Engineering Manager for the claude-wiki-pages development team and the top-level entry point. Owns phase sequencing, task assignment across the four lanes, shared-file edit serialization, integration, and the final gate run before an item is declared done. Spawns and coordinates the PM, Architect…
wiki-dev-pm
Product Manager for the claude-wiki-pages development team. Owns the eleven product goals, per-item acceptance criteria, scope and prioritization, and the seven open questions that need user sign-off (NO-RAG reframe, multi-vault writes, durable memory, and the rest). Use when an item needs a product decision, an…
product-manager
Product management expert for roadmap decisions, feature prioritization, and scope management. Acts as a startup PM - ruthlessly prioritizes, focuses on speed over perfection. Use proactively for strategic product decisions.
code-reviewer
PROACTIVELY use after code changes to review for security, performance, correctness, and maintainability. Reads diffs, analyzes patterns, reports issues by severity. Does not modify code.
session-reviewer
Analyze conversation patterns to detect recurring frustrations, corrections, and problematic tool usage. Feeds findings into practices/inbox/ or CLAUDEERRORS.md. Use after long sessions or when /forge insights triggers analysis.