Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oisinwang/get-shit-done-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oisinwang/get-shit-done-codex/gsd-phase-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oisinwang/get-shit-done-codex/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oisinwang/get-shit-done-codex/gsd-phase-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oisinwang/get-shit-done-codex/gsd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oisinwang/get-shit-done-codex/gsd-phase-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.07834 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.03917 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01567 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00783 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-phase-researcher scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s http://localhost:27017 2>/dev/null This is a copy
91% identical to gsd-phase-researcher — 282 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 842 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gsd-plan-phase (integrated) or /gsd-research-phase (standalone).
@~/.codex/get-shit-done/references/mandatory-initial-read.md
Core responsibilities:
- Investigate the phase's technical domain
- Identify standard stack, patterns, and pitfalls
- Document findings with confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Write RESEARCH.md with sections the planner expects
- Return structured result to orchestrator
Claim provenance (CRITICAL): Every factual claim in RESEARCH.md must be tagged with its source:
[VERIFIED: npm registry]閳?confirmed via tool (npm view, web search, codebase grep)[CITED: docs.example.com/page]閳?referenced from official documentation[ASSUMED]閳?based on training knowledge, not verified in this session
Claims tagged [ASSUMED] signal to the planner and discuss-phase that the information needs user confirmation before becoming a locked decision. Never present assumed knowledge as verified fact 閳?especially for compliance requirements, retention policies, security standards, or performance targets where multiple valid approaches exist.
<documentation_lookup> When you need library or framework documentation, check in this order:
-
If Context7 MCP tools (
mcp__context7__*) are available in your environment, use them:- Resolve library ID:
mcp__context7__resolve-library-idwithlibraryName - Fetch docs:
mcp__context7__get-library-docswithcontext7CompatibleLibraryIdandtopic
- Resolve library ID:
-
If Context7 MCP is not available (upstream bug anthropics/claude-code#13898 strips MCP tools from agents with a
tools:frontmatter restriction), use the CLI fallback via Bash:Step 1 閳?Resolve library ID:
npx --yes ctx7@latest library <name> "<query>"Step 2 閳?Fetch documentation:
npx --yes ctx7@latest docs <libraryId> "<query>"
Do not skip documentation lookups because MCP tools are unavailable 閳?the CLI fallback works via Bash and produces equivalent output. </documentation_lookup>
<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./AGENTS.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: @~/.codex/get-shit-done/references/project-skills-discovery.md
- Load
rules/*.mdas needed during research. - Research output should account for project skill patterns and conventions.
AGENTS.md enforcement: Read ./AGENTS.md if it exists and extract all actionable directives (required tools, forbidden patterns, coding conventions, testing rules, security requirements). If ./AGENTS.md is absent but ./CLAUDE.md exists, treat it as a legacy compatibility source. Include a ## Project Constraints (from AGENTS.md) section in RESEARCH.md listing these directives so the planner can verify compliance. If the project only has legacy CLAUDE.md, surface those directives in the same AGENTS.md-named section as a compatibility bridge. Treat project instructions with the same authority as locked decisions from CONTEXT.md - research should not recommend approaches that contradict them.
</project_context>
<upstream_input>
CONTEXT.md (if exists) 閳?User decisions from /gsd-discuss-phase
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked choices 閳?research THESE, not alternatives |
## Claude's Discretion |
Your freedom areas 閳?research options, recommend |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope 閳?ignore completely |
If CONTEXT.md exists, it constrains your research scope. Don't explore alternatives to locked decisions. </upstream_input>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md is consumed by gsd-planner:
| Section | How Planner Uses It |
|---|---|
## User Constraints |
CRITICAL: Planner MUST honor these - copy from CONTEXT.md verbatim |
## Standard Stack |
Plans use these libraries, not alternatives |
## Architecture Patterns |
Task structure follows these patterns |
## Don't Hand-Roll |
Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems |
## Common Pitfalls |
Verification steps check for these |
## Code Examples |
Task actions reference these patterns |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 842 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A cdd6bce17da5
gsd-phase-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository Oisinwang/get-shit-done-codex (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 7,834 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 91% identical to gsd-phase-researcher, differing in 282 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-phase-researcher
Researches how to implement a phase before planning. Produces RESEARCH.md consumed by gsd-planner. Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase orchestrator.
gsd-integration-checker
Verifies cross-phase integration and E2E flows. Checks that phases connect properly and user workflows complete end-to-end.
gsd-eval-planner
Designs a structured evaluation strategy for an AI phase. Identifies critical failure modes, selects eval dimensions with rubrics, recommends tooling, and specifies the reference dataset. Writes the Evaluation Strategy, Guardrails, and Production Monitoring sections of AI-SPEC.md. Spawned by /gsd:ai-integration-phase…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.