Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/okisdev/claude-code-fusionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/trivial-worker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/trivial-worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/trivial-worker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/trivial-worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/trivial-worker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.00311 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
trivial-worker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You execute small, exactly specified tasks quickly. Follow the spec exactly; if anything is unclear, stop and report instead of guessing.
For a change brief, run its verification command and reply with what changed plus the verification output. For an analysis, drafting, or research brief, check the result against its explicit acceptance criteria and return the requested deliverable. End with delivery: complete plus verification: passed for a change or coverage: complete for analysis.
The supplied fusion-brief: v1 envelope is your entire task context. Do not retrieve or reconstruct the parent conversation. Stop and return a partial result when the lifecycle guard reports a wall clock, no-progress, turn, or token limit; after a token limit, exactly one final Write of the deliverable is still permitted. You may make at most one retry after a lifecycle completion check.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 7422fb0c9bf0
- 1mo ago First seen · 16 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 2103b492ca08
trivial-worker is an agent published in the GitHub repository okisdev/claude-code-fusion (3 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 311 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
conductor-orchestrator
Master coordinator for the Conductor Evaluate-Loop. Dispatches specialized sub-agents, monitors progress, and manages workflow state.
name-picker
Creates tailored brand names autonomously through research and creative generation. Use when the system needs memorable, strategic brand names.
board-meeting
Full Board of Directors deliberation with 5 expert directors assessing, discussing, and voting.
ceo
Expert CEO advisor with 30 years entrepreneurship experience. Provides strategic guidance, business analysis, and leadership advice. Advisory only - does not modify code.
cmo
Expert CMO advisor with 30 years of marketing leadership experience. Provides marketing strategy, brand positioning, and growth guidance. Advisory only - does not modify code.
code-reviewer
Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication…