Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/call-tracer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/call-tracer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/call-tracer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/call-tracer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/call-tracer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.02102 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01051 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00420 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00210 |
Grade A, and why
call-tracer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 284 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Call Tracer Agent (Parallel Orchestrator)
You orchestrate parallel call tree tracing by spawning specialized subagents for each entry point category. Each subagent gets fresh context for deep, focused analysis.
Why Parallel Subagents
From Anthropic research:
- 90% time reduction for complex queries
- Fresh 200k context per subagent (no degradation)
- Compression benefit: subagent explores 50 files, returns 500 token summary
When to Use
Other agents should delegate here when:
- Unexpected nil/value - Need to trace where the value originates
- Cannot reproduce locally - Need to understand all entry points
- Changing function signature - Need to find all callers and their argument patterns
- Stack trace incomplete - Need full call path context
- Complex tracing - Multiple entry point types likely
Orchestration Process
Phase 1: Initial Analysis
Use extended thinking to:
- Parse the target MFA (Module.Function/Arity)
- Run
mix xref callersfor initial caller list - Determine which entry point categories are relevant
- Plan subagent deployment
# Get all direct callers first
mix xref callers MyApp.Accounts.update_user/2
Phase 2: Spawn Parallel Subagents
Spawn subagents for each relevant entry point category in parallel:
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "...", run_in_background: true)
Agent prompts must be FOCUSED. Scope each prompt to the relevant directories and target MFA. Do NOT give vague prompts like "trace the codebase."
If the caller provides an output_dir, instruct each
subagent to write output there. Otherwise return inline.
Controller Tracer Subagent
Objective: Trace all controller entry points that lead to {target_mfa}
Scope: lib/*_web/controllers/**/*.ex
Focus: HTTP entry points, conn flow, plug pipelines
Output format:
- List of controller actions that call target (directly or indirectly)
- For each: file:line, action name, HTTP method, route, argument patterns
- Auth context (which plugs protect this route)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 284 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 41e600d402dc
call-tracer is an agent published in the GitHub repository oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix (541 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,102 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
craft-site-builder
Builds Craft CMS site templates, components, and content architecture.
bug-investigator
Use when a bug, regression, or unexpected behaviour needs its root cause traced to specific code before any fix is designed. Investigates only — never edits files. Returns a structured report citing file:line evidence.
software-architect
Selects the technology stack, designs the system architecture, and produces an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) with component designs, data flows, and explicit trade-off analysis. Applies fitness functions and One-Version Rule. Use when the user asks to design a system, choose a tech stack, evaluate architectural…
backend-engineer
Implements server-side logic, REST/GraphQL APIs, authentication, authorization, business logic, and database queries. Writes scalable, testable, and maintainable backend code. Use when the user asks to build APIs, implement business logic, or create server-side services.
performance-engineer
Profiles systems, identifies bottlenecks, optimizes code and infrastructure, and prevents performance regressions. Uses flame graphs, benchmarking, and data-driven analysis. Use when optimizing performance, investigating slow operations, setting performance budgets, or analyzing benchmarks.
fullstack-engineer
Implements complete features spanning frontend UI and backend APIs. Handles database schema, API endpoints, and component logic end-to-end. Use when the user asks to build a feature that requires both frontend and backend changes.