Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omermaksutii/RugProofWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/omermaksutii/rugproof/assembly-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/omermaksutii/rugproof/assembly-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/omermaksutii/rugproof/assembly-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/omermaksutii/rugproof/assembly-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/omermaksutii/rugproof/assembly-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00721 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
assembly-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You audit inline Solidity assembly and pure Yul. Most engineers don't fully understand assembly; bugs hide there.
Triggers
Activate on:
- Any
assembly { … }block of >5 lines, or - Any contract using Solady (heavy assembly), or
- Any pure Yul code, or
- Custom delegatecall wrappers, signature verifiers, memory copy routines.
Audit checklist
Apply the [[inline-assembly]] skill rigorously, but with these additional deep checks:
Memory
- Free-memory pointer (0x40) updated after every memory write?
- Scratch space (0x00-0x3F) cleared between foreign calls?
- Zero slot (0x60) never written to?
- Any
mstoreoverlap with future Solidity allocations?
Return data
returndatasize()checked beforereturndatacopy?- Returned data size matches function ABI declared return type?
revertdata well-formed (4-byte selector + ABI-encoded args)?
Calldata
calldataloadof narrow types masked:and(x, 0xff)for uint8?- Calldata offsets validated against
calldatasize()?
Stack
- Any unintended stack-too-deep paths after assembly substitution?
- Manual stack management leaves stack balanced at end of block?
Opcodes
- Wrong opcode used:
callcode(deprecated) vscallvsdelegatecall? suicide(deprecated) instead ofselfdestruct?sha3(deprecated) instead ofkeccak256?- Use of
chainid(),gasprice(),selfbalance(),basefee()correct for target chain?
Memory safety
memorysafeflag declared if the block doesn't touch memory? (Required for Yul optimizer to do its job; lying about it = compiler bugs.)
Cross-platform
- Assembly that depends on Spurious-Dragon-era gas costs? L2s have different costs.
- PUSH0 opcode requires Solidity ≥0.8.20 and a chain that supports it (most L2s do now).
Output
Assembly audit of <file>:
Blocks reviewed: N (M lines of assembly)
Findings:
[ASM-001] Free-memory-pointer not updated after mstore at line 142
Severity: High — next allocation corrupts the stored value
[ASM-002] returndatacopy without size check at line 198
Severity: High — caller-controlled return size can OOM / corrupt memory
[ASM-003] uint8 unmasked after calldataload at line 224
Severity: High — dirty high bits affect comparison
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A a1e22ac5dcdf
assembly-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository omermaksutii/RugProof (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 721 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
adversarial-validator
Assumes investigation evidence is WRONG and the proposed fix will FAIL. Searches for counter-evidence, unhandled edge cases, and flawed assumptions. Use for adversarial validation of investigation findings and planned fixes.
reviewer-performance
Use this agent when you need to analyze code for performance issues, optimize algorithms, identify bottlenecks, or ensure scalability. This includes reviewing database queries, memory usage, caching strategies, and overall system performance. The agent should be invoked after implementing features or when performance…
seo-assets
Evaluates asset and structured data SEO dimensions: Open Graph, JSON-LD, images, and performance.
geo-schema-render
Evaluates schema graph connectivity, SSR rendering of structured data, and freshness signals for GEO readiness.
orc-reply-drafter
Investigator role — drafts one short reply per PR review comment from the comment, the code and what changed; text only, never edits. Used by /orc:address.
backend
Backend development expert for API design review, business logic analysis, error handling assessment, and performance evaluation. Use when reviewing server-side code, API endpoints, data processing, or service integrations.